Coordinate Encoding on Linear Grids for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In solving partial differential equations (PDEs), machine learning utilizing physical laws has received considerable attention owing to advantages such as mesh-free solutions, unsupervised learning, and feasibility for solving high-dimensional problems. An effective approach is based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), which are based on deep neural networks known for their excellent performance in various academic and industrial applications. However, PINNs struggled with model training owing to significantly slow convergence because of a spectral bias problem. In this study, we propose a PINN-based method equipped with a coordinate-encoding layer on linear grid cells. The proposed method improves the training convergence speed by separating the local domains using grid cells. Moreover, it reduces the overall computational cost by using axis-independent linear grid cells. The method also achieves efficient and stable model training by adequately interpolating the encoded coordinates between grid points using natural cubic splines, which guarantees continuous derivative functions of the model computed for the loss functions. The results of numerical experiments demonstrate the effective performance and efficient training convergence speed of the proposed method.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2026.
Builds on
20 of 32 references.
References · 20
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
- 2023K-Planes: Explicit Radiance Fields in Space, Time, and Appearancecited by 746
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
- 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 284
- 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 236
- 2024Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 113
- 2022Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) Samplingcited by 73
- 2023Separable Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 66
8 more
- 2022Failure-informed adaptive sampling for PINNscited by 64
- 2021Spline-PINN: Approaching PDEs without Data using Fast, Physics-Informed Hermite-Spline CNNscited by 38
- 2024Improved Implicit Neural Representation with Fourier Reparameterized Trainingcited by 36
- 2022Partial Differential Equations Meet Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 25
- 2022PIXEL: Physics-Informed Cell Representations for Fast and Accurate PDE Solverscited by 22
- 2023Efficient physics-informed neural networks using hash encodingcited by 21
- 2024Functional Tensor Decompositions for Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2023GaborPINN: Efficient physics informed neural networks using multiplicative filtered networkscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.