SPA: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Knowledge Injection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While large language models (LLMs) are pretrained on massive amounts of data, their knowledge coverage remains incomplete in specialized, data-scarce domains, motivating extensive efforts to study synthetic data generation for knowledge injection. We propose SPA (Scaling Prompt-engineered Augmentation), a simple but tough-to-beat baseline that uses a small set of carefully designed prompts to generate large-scale synthetic data for knowledge injection. Through systematic comparisons, we find that SPA outperforms several strong baselines. Furthermore, we identify two key limitations of prior approaches: (1) while RL-based methods may improve the token efficiency of LLM-based data augmentation at small scale, they suffer from diversity collapse as data scales, leading to diminishing returns; and (2) while multi-stage prompting may outperform simple augmentation methods, their advantages can disappear after careful prompt tuning. Our results suggest that, for knowledge injection, careful prompt design combined with straightforward large-scale augmentation can be surprisingly effective, and we hope SPA can serve as a strong baseline for future studies in this area. Our code is available at https://github.com/Tangkexian/SPA.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.
Builds on
49 of 60 references.
References · 49
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
37 more
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,800
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 976
- 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 940
- 2023BloombergGPT: A Large Language Model for Financecited by 923
- 2023Textbooks Are All You Needcited by 561
- 2022BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Miningcited by 531
- 2021Fast Model Editing at Scalecited by 491
- 2022Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledgecited by 452
- 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 425
- 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 399
- 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 343
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 328
- 2019Transfer Learning in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: An Evaluation of BERT and ELMo on Ten Benchmarking Datasetscited by 298
- 2023MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questionscited by 292
- 2024MultiHop-RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Hop Queriescited by 253
- 2023Evaluating the Ripple Effects of Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 238
- 2023Large Language Models in Finance: A Surveycited by 223
- 2021QuALITY: Question Answering with Long Input Texts, Yes!cited by 204
- 2023Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMscited by 175
- 2023Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?cited by 167
- 2024Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modelingcited by 156
- 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Lawscited by 137
- 2025Self-Adapting Language Modelscited by 71
- 2024Injecting New Knowledge into Large Language Models via Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 56
- 2024Synthetic continued pretrainingcited by 56
- 2024Standardizing the Measurement of Text Diversity: A Tool and a Comparative Analysis of Scorescited by 50
- 2024Detection and Measurement of Syntactic Templates in Generated Textcited by 44
- 2024Surveying the Effects of Quality, Diversity, and Complexity in Synthetic Data From Large Language Modelscited by 31
- 2025Data Mixing Can Induce Phase Transitions in Knowledge Acquisitioncited by 15
- 2022Self-Repetition in Abstractive Neural Summarizerscited by 13
- 2025Learning Facts at Scale with Active Readingcited by 11
- 2025GraphGen: Enhancing Supervised Fine-Tuning for LLMs with Knowledge-Driven Synthetic Data Generationcited by 7
- 2025Synthesize-on-Graph: Knowledgeable Synthetic Data Generation for Continue Pre-training of Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2026Knowledge is Not Enough: Injecting RL Skills for Continual Adaptationcited by 3
- 2025Comparing Knowledge Injection Methods for LLMs in a Low-Resource Regimecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.