Riding Brainwaves in LLM Space: Understanding Activation Patterns Using Individual Neural Signatures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Consumer-grade EEG is entering everyday devices, from earbuds to headbands, raising the question of whether language models can be adapted to individual neural responses. We test this by asking whether frozen LLM representations encode person-specific EEG signals, directions in activation space that predict one person's brain activity but not another's. Using word-level EEG from 30 participants reading naturalistic sentences (ZuCo corpus), we train a separate linear probe for each person, mapping hidden states from a frozen Qwen 2.5 7B to that individual's EEG power. Person-specific probes outperform a single population probe on every EEG feature tested; for high-gamma power, the person-specific probe achieves rho = 0.183, a ninefold improvement over the population probe (rho = 0.020, p < 10^-4). A negative control, fixation count, shows no person-specific advantage (p = 0.360); fixation count reflects word length and frequency rather than individual cognition. The individual directions are temporally stable (split-half cosine = 0.824), non-transferable across people (self rho = 0.369 vs. other rho = 0.143, p < 10^-19), and distinct from the shared population signal: person-specific probes retain predictive power after the population component is removed. The person-specific signal concentrates in the model's deep layers, rising consistently with depth and peaking at Layer 24 of 28. The results are consistent across architectures (LLaMA 3.1 8B) and survive word-level confound controls. Frozen language models contain stable, person-specific neural directions in their deep layers, providing a geometric foundation for EEG-driven personalization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.
Builds on
14 of 33 references.
References · 14
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023The Geometry of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure in Large Language Model Representations of True/False Datasetscited by 673
- 2023Emergent Linear Representations in World Models of Self-Supervised Sequence Modelscited by 313
- 2019Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain)cited by 128
- 2024Personalization of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 100
- 2019ZuCo 2.0: A Dataset of Physiological Recordings During Natural Reading and Annotationcited by 65
- 2023Instruction-tuning Aligns LLMs to the Human Braincited by 39
2 more
- 2019CogniVal: A Framework for Cognitive Word Embedding Evaluationcited by 27
- 2025SteerX: Disentangled Steering for LLM Personalizationcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.