RuntimeSlicer: Towards Generalizable Unified Runtime State Representation for Failure Management
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern software systems operate at unprecedented scale and complexity, where effective failure management is critical yet increasingly challenging. Metrics, traces, and logs provide complementary views of system runtime behavior, but existing failure management approaches typically rely on task-oriented pipelines that tightly couple modality-specific preprocessing, representation learning, and downstream models, resulting in limited generalization across tasks and systems. To fill this gap, we propose RuntimeSlicer, a unified runtime state representation model towards generalizable failure management. RuntimeSlicer pre-trains a task-agnostic representation model that directly encodes metrics, traces, and logs into a single, aligned system-state embedding capturing the holistic runtime condition of the system. To train RuntimeSlicer, we introduce Unified Runtime Contrastive Learning, which integrates heterogeneous training data sources and optimizes complementary objectives for cross-modality alignment and temporal consistency. Building upon the learned system-state embeddings, we further propose State-Aware Task-Oriented Tuning, which performs unsupervised partitioning of runtime states and enables state-conditioned adaptation for downstream tasks. This design allows lightweight task-oriented models to be trained on top of the unified embedding without redesigning modality-specific encoders or preprocessing pipelines. Preliminary experiments on the AIOps 2022 dataset demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of RuntimeSlicer for system state modeling and failure management tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.
Builds on
10 of 43 references.
References · 10
- 2024Root Cause Analysis In Microservice Using Neural Granger Causal Discoverycited by 31
- 2023Robust Failure Diagnosis of Microservice System through Multimodal Datacited by 23
- 2025AgentFM: Role-Aware Failure Management for Distributed Databases with LLM-Driven Multi-Agentscited by 18
- 2025ThinkFL: Self-Refining Failure Localization for Microservice Systems via Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 17
- 2024Multivariate Log-based Anomaly Detection for Distributed Databasecited by 12
- 2025Adaptive Root Cause Localization for Microservice Systems with Multi-Agent Recursion-of-Thoughtcited by 11
- 2025MicroRemed: Benchmarking LLMs in Microservices Remediationcited by 10
- 2024TimeGPT in Load Forecasting: A Large Time Series Model Perspectivecited by 8
- 2025United We Stand: Towards End-to-End Log-based Fault Diagnosis via Interactive Multi-Task Learningcited by 7
- 2026Hypothesize-Then-Verify: Speculative Root Cause Analysis for Microservices with Pathwise Parallelismcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026From Feedback Loops to Policy Updates: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for LLM-Based Alpha Factor Discoverycited by 4
- 2026E2E-REME: Towards End-to-End Microservices Auto-Remediation via Experience-Simulation Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 3
- 2026Towards Robust LLM Post-Training: Automatic Failure Management for Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 2
- 2026Towards In-Depth Root Cause Localization for Microservices with Multi-Agent Recursion-of-Thoughtcited by 0
- 2026From Feedback Loops to Policy Updates: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for LLM-Based Alpha Factor Discovery14 May 2026
- 2026Towards In-Depth Root Cause Localization for Microservices with Multi-Agent Recursion-of-Thought14 May 2026
- 2026Towards Robust LLM Post-Training: Automatic Failure Management for Reinforcement Fine-Tuning6 May 2026
- 2026E2E-REME: Towards End-to-End Microservices Auto-Remediation via Experience-Simulation Reinforcement Fine-Tuning13 Apr 2026