mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hypothesize-Then-Verify: Speculative Root Cause Analysis for Microservices with Pathwise Parallelism

arXiv 2601.02736 ↗First posted 6 Jan 2026cs.SE cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Microservice systems have become the backbone of cloud-native enterprise applications due to their resource elasticity, loosely coupled architecture, and lightweight deployment. Yet, the intrinsic complexity and dynamic runtime interactions of such systems inevitably give rise to anomalies. Ensuring system reliability therefore hinges on effective root cause analysis (RCA), which entails not only localizing the source of anomalies but also characterizing the underlying failures in a timely and interpretable manner. Recent advances in intelligent RCA techniques, particularly those powered by large language models (LLMs), have demonstrated promising capabilities, as LLMs reduce reliance on handcrafted features while offering cross-platform adaptability, task generalization, and flexibility. However, existing LLM-based methods still suffer from two critical limitations: (a) limited exploration diversity, which undermines accuracy, and (b) heavy dependence on large-scale LLMs, which results in slow inference. To overcome these challenges, we propose SpecRCA, a speculative root cause analysis framework for microservices that adopts a textithypothesize-then-verify paradigm. SpecRCA first leverages a hypothesis drafting module to rapidly generate candidate root causes, and then employs a parallel root cause verifier to efficiently validate them. Preliminary experiments on the AIOps 2022 dataset demonstrate that SpecRCA achieves superior accuracy and efficiency compared to existing approaches, highlighting its potential as a practical solution for scalable and interpretable RCA in complex microservice environments.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2026.

Builds on

16 of 40 references.

References · 16

  1. 2025AgentEvolver: Towards Efficient Self-Evolving Agent Systemcited by 77
  2. 2023RCAgent: Cloud Root Cause Analysis by Autonomous Agents with Tool-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 62
  3. 2025Flow-of-Action: SOP Enhanced LLM-Based Multi-Agent System for Root Cause Analysiscited by 32
  4. 2024Automated Root Causing of Cloud Incidents using In-Context Learning with GPT-4cited by 28
  5. 2024mABC: multi-Agent Blockchain-Inspired Collaboration for root cause analysis in micro-services architecturecited by 26
  6. 2025AgentFM: Role-Aware Failure Management for Distributed Databases with LLM-Driven Multi-Agentscited by 18
  7. 2025A Survey of AIOps in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 18
  8. 2024Face It Yourselves: An LLM-Based Two-Stage Strategy to Localize Configuration Errors via Logscited by 17
  9. 2025ThinkFL: Self-Refining Failure Localization for Microservice Systems via Reinforcement Fine-Tuningcited by 17
  10. 2025TAMO: Fine-Grained Root Cause Analysis via Tool-Assisted LLM Agent with Multi-Modality Observation Data in Cloud-Native Systemscited by 13
  11. 2024Multivariate Log-based Anomaly Detection for Distributed Databasecited by 12
  12. 2024Cloud Atlas: Efficient Fault Localization for Cloud Systems using Language Models and Causal Insightcited by 11
4 more
  1. 2024Reducing Events to Augment Log-based Anomaly Detection Models: An Empirical Studycited by 7
  2. 2025The Multi-Agent Fault Localization System Based on Monte Carlo Tree Search Approachcited by 6
  3. 2019Developing Self-Adaptive Microservice Systems: Challenges and Directionscited by 5
  4. 2021Design, Monitoring, and Testing of Microservices Systems: The Practitioners' Perspectivecited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.