PAVE: Premise-Aware Validation and Editing for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval-augmented language models can retrieve relevant evidence yet still commit to answers before explicitly checking whether the retrieved context supports the conclusion. We present PAVE (Premise-Grounded Answer Validation and Editing), an inference-time validation layer for evidence-grounded question answering. PAVE decomposes retrieved context into question-conditioned atomic facts, drafts an answer, scores how well that draft is supported by the extracted premises, and revises low-support outputs before finalization. The resulting trace makes answer commitment auditable at the level of explicit premises, support scores, and revision decisions. In controlled ablations with a fixed retriever and backbone, PAVE outperforms simpler post-retrieval baselines in two evidence-grounded QA settings, with the largest gain reaching 32.7 accuracy points on a span-grounded benchmark. We view these findings as proof-of-concept evidence that explicit premise extraction plus support-gated revision can strengthen evidence-grounded consistency in retrieval-augmented LLM systems.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 16 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2026.
Builds on
16 of 18 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexity21 Mar
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection17 Oct
Other references · 14
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 519
- 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoningcited by 379
- 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 317
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 266
- 2023Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 211
- 2023Dense X Retrieval: What Retrieval Granularity Should We Use?cited by 88
- 2024LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Modelscited by 67
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Improving Context Fidelity via Native Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
- 2026CiteGuard-RAG: A Validation-Centered AI System for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering
- 2026Stateful Evidence-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Iterative Reasoning
- 2025NeoQA: Evidence-based Question Answering with Generated News Events
- 2026Beyond Self-Knowledge: Propagating Uncertainty Across Reasoning and Retrieval in LLMs
- 2026Context Shapes LLMs Retrieval-Augmented Fact-Checking Effectiveness
- 2025Retrieval Augmented Question Answering: When Should LLMs Admit Ignorance?
- 2026Regime Boundary Alignment for Evidence-Gated Question Answering