mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PAVE: Premise-Aware Validation and Editing for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs

arXiv 2603.20673 ↗First posted 21 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-augmented language models can retrieve relevant evidence yet still commit to answers before explicitly checking whether the retrieved context supports the conclusion. We present PAVE (Premise-Grounded Answer Validation and Editing), an inference-time validation layer for evidence-grounded question answering. PAVE decomposes retrieved context into question-conditioned atomic facts, drafts an answer, scores how well that draft is supported by the extracted premises, and revises low-support outputs before finalization. The resulting trace makes answer commitment auditable at the level of explicit premises, support scores, and revision decisions. In controlled ablations with a fixed retriever and backbone, PAVE outperforms simpler post-retrieval baselines in two evidence-grounded QA settings, with the largest gain reaching 32.7 accuracy points on a span-grounded benchmark. We view these findings as proof-of-concept evidence that explicit premise extraction plus support-gated revision can strengthen evidence-grounded consistency in retrieval-augmented LLM systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 16 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Mar 2026.

Builds on

16 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Adaptive-RAG: Learning to Adapt Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models through Question Complexity21 Mar
  2. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection17 Oct

Other references · 14

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  3. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  4. 2019PubMedQA: A Dataset for Biomedical Research Question Answeringcited by 1,271
  5. 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
  6. 2024RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrievalcited by 519
  7. 2023Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoningcited by 379
  8. 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 317
  9. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 266
  10. 2023Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 211
  11. 2023Dense X Retrieval: What Retrieval Granularity Should We Use?cited by 88
  12. 2024LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Modelscited by 67
2 more
  1. 2024Aligning with Logic: Measuring, Evaluating and Improving Logical Preference Consistency in Large Language Modelscited by 12
  2. 2024RAGged Edges: The Double-Edged Sword of Retrieval-Augmented Chatbotscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Improving Context Fidelity via Native Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning
  2. 2026CiteGuard-RAG: A Validation-Centered AI System for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering
  3. 2026Stateful Evidence-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Iterative Reasoning
  4. 2025NeoQA: Evidence-based Question Answering with Generated News Events
  5. 2026Beyond Self-Knowledge: Propagating Uncertainty Across Reasoning and Retrieval in LLMs
  6. 2026Context Shapes LLMs Retrieval-Augmented Fact-Checking Effectiveness
  7. 2025Retrieval Augmented Question Answering: When Should LLMs Admit Ignorance?
  8. 2026Regime Boundary Alignment for Evidence-Gated Question Answering