Bypassing Document Ingestion: An MCP Approach to Financial Q&A
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Answering financial questions is often treated as an information retrieval problem. In practice, however, much of the relevant information is already available in curated vendor systems, especially for quantitative analysis. We study whether, and under which conditions, Model Context Protocol (MCP) offers a more reliable alternative to standard retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) by allowing large language models (LLMs) to interact directly with data rather than relying on document ingestion and chunk retrieval. We test this by building a custom MCP server that exposes LSEG APIs as tools and evaluating it on the FinDER benchmark. The approach performs particularly well on the Financials subset, achieving up to 80.4% accuracy on multi-step numerical questions when relevant context is retrieved. The paper thus provides both a baseline for MCP-based financial question answering (QA) and evidence on where this approach breaks down, such as for questions requiring qualitative or document-specific context. Overall, direct access to curated data is a lightweight and effective alternative to document-centric RAG for quantitative financial QA, but not a substitute for all financial QA tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.
Builds on
29 of 46 references.
References · 29
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
- 2021FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Datacited by 552
- 2022Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledgecited by 452
- 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 408
- 2021TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Financecited by 402
17 more
- 2023FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answeringcited by 261
- 2025Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directionscited by 257
- 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agentscited by 223
- 2025MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP Serverscited by 101
- 2017Structured Attention Networkscited by 95
- 2024Improving Retrieval for RAG based Question Answering Models on Financial Documentscited by 48
- 2024Financial Report Chunking for Effective Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 46
- 2025MCP-AgentBench: Evaluating Real-World Language Agent Performance with MCP-Mediated Toolscited by 30
- 2025Securing the Model Context Protocol (MCP): Risks, Controls, and Governancecited by 22
- 2025FinDER: Financial Dataset for Question Answering and Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 17
- 2025MCPGuard : Automatically Detecting Vulnerabilities in MCP Serverscited by 13
- 2023Towards reducing hallucination in extracting information from financial reports using Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2025Who Judges the Judge? LLM Jury-on-Demand: Building Trustworthy LLM Evaluation Systemscited by 5
- 2026Is Agentic RAG worth it? An experimental comparison of RAG approachescited by 5
- 2025Understanding Structured Financial Data with LLMs: A Case Study on Fraud Detectioncited by 4
- 2025QuantMCP: Grounding Large Language Models in Verifiable Financial Realitycited by 2
- 2025No-Knowledge Alarms for Misaligned LLMs-as-Judgescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025VeritasFi: An Adaptable, Multi-tiered RAG Framework for Multi-modal Financial Question Answering
- 2024SEC-QA: A Systematic Evaluation Corpus for Financial QA
- 2026Decomposing Retrieval Failures in RAG for Long-Document Financial Question Answering
- 2025Metadata-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Financial Question Answering
- 2025Optimizing Retrieval Strategies for Financial Question Answering Documents in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
- 2025Rethinking Retrieval: From Traditional Retrieval Augmented Generation to Agentic and Non-Vector Reasoning Systems in the Financial Domain for Large Language Models
- 2025MultiFinRAG: An Optimized Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Framework for Financial Question Answering
- 2025AstuteRAG-FQA: Task-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Proprietary Data Challenges in Financial Question Answering