mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Understanding Pruning Regimes in Vision-Language Models Through Domain-Aware Layer Selection

arXiv 2603.20275 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformer-based vision-language models (VLMs) contain substantial depth redundancy, yet the effect of removing specific decoder layers remains poorly understood, especially for domains that require tight coupling between perception and multi-step reasoning. We study structured decoder layer pruning through the lens of domain-aware activation similarity, measuring how strongly each layer transforms representations for math versus non-math inputs. This yields simple math-aware, non-math-aware, and mixed ranking criteria that identify layers whose input-output activations change least within a target domain. Across two state-of-the-art VLMs and a broad suite of math and general multimodal benchmarks, we uncover a consistent three-regime structure: at low pruning budgets, performance is highly sensitive to which layers are removed; at moderate budgets, methods converge as structural damage accumulates; and at high budgets, structural continuity dominates, favoring spacing-aware strategies. Our domain-aware rankings achieve the strongest stability in the ranking-sensitive regime, while matching or exceeding structure-aware baselines at larger budgets. These results provide a clearer picture of how depth contributes to domain-specific behavior in VLMs and offer a practical, interpretable approach to reducing model depth without sacrificing essential mathematical or general vision-language capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 21 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

Builds on

21 of 27 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  4. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  5. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  6. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  7. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
  8. 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,301
  9. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  10. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
  11. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
  12. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
9 more
  1. 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
  2. 2023V*: Guided Visual Search as a Core Mechanism in Multimodal LLMscited by 482
  3. 2019Reducing Transformer Depth on Demand with Structured Dropoutcited by 439
  4. 2024LMMs-Eval: Reality Check on the Evaluation of Large Multimodal Modelscited by 353
  5. 2025LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Trainingcited by 244
  6. 2020Compressing BERT: Studying the Effects of Weight Pruning on Transfer Learningcited by 185
  7. 2025Region-based Cluster Discrimination for Visual Representation Learningcited by 13
  8. 2021Greedy-layer Pruning: Speeding up Transformer Models for Natural Language Processingcited by 11
  9. 2026VisTIRA: Closing the Image-Text Modality Gap in Visual Math Reasoning via Structured Tool Integrationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Patching to Pruning Visual Computation in Vision Language Models
  2. 2026Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention
  3. 2026Structural Pruning of Large Vision Language Models: A Comprehensive Study on Pruning Dynamics, Recovery, and Data Efficiency
  4. 2026Topology-Aware Layer Pruning for Large Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Prune Once: Retraining-Free Task-Agnostic Pruning for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025Balanced Token Pruning: Accelerating Vision Language Models Beyond Local Optimization
  7. 2026SwiftVLM: Efficient Vision-Language Model Inference via Cross-Layer Token Bypass
  8. 2026When Attention Collapses: Stage-Aware Visual Token Pruning from Structure to Semantics