mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TinyML Enhances CubeSat Mission Capabilities

arXiv 2603.20174 ↗First posted 20 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Earth observation (EO) missions traditionally rely on transmitting raw or minimally processed imagery from satellites to ground stations for computationally intensive analysis. This paradigm is infeasible for CubeSat systems due to stringent constraints on the onboard embedded processors, energy availability, and communication bandwidth. To overcome these limitations, the paper presents a TinyML-based Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets) model optimization and deployment pipeline for onboard image classification, enabling accurate, energy-efficient, and hardware-aware inference under CubeSat-class constraints. Our pipeline integrates structured iterative pruning, post-training INT8 quantization, and hardware-aware operator mapping to compress models and align them with the heterogeneous compute architecture of the STM32N6 microcontroller from STMicroelectronics. This Microcontroller Unit (MCU) integrates a novel Arm Cortex-M55 core and a Neural-ART Neural Processing Unit (NPU), providing a realistic proxy for CubeSat onboard computers. The paper evaluates the proposed approach on three EO benchmark datasets (i.e., EuroSAT, RS_C11, MEDIC) and four models (i.e., SqueezeNet, MobileNetV3, EfficientNet, MCUNetV1). We demonstrate an average reduction in RAM usage of 89.55% and Flash memory of 70.09% for the optimized models, significantly decreasing downlink bandwidth requirements while maintaining task-acceptable accuracy (with a drop ranging from 0.4 to 8.6 percentage points compared to the Float32 baseline). The energy consumption per inference ranges from 0.68 mJ to 6.45 mJ, with latency spanning from 3.22 ms to 30.38 ms. These results fully satisfy the stringent energy budgets and real-time constraints required for efficient onboard EO processing.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.

Builds on

17 of 47 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  4. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  5. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
  6. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  7. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  8. 2019Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deploymentcited by 778
  9. 2020MCUNet: Tiny Deep Learning on IoT Devicescited by 269
  10. 2019MLPerf Inference Benchmarkcited by 195
  11. 2018CMSIS-NN: Efficient Neural Network Kernels for Arm Cortex-M CPUscited by 116
  12. 2019MLPerf Training Benchmarkcited by 114
5 more
  1. 2020Satellite Communications in the New Space Era: A Survey and Future Challengescited by 36
  2. 2023A Machine Learning-oriented Survey on Tiny Machine Learningcited by 26
  3. 2021MEDIC: A Multi-Task Learning Dataset for Disaster Image Classificationcited by 20
  4. 2023Reaching the Edge of the Edge: Image Analysis in Spacecited by 4
  5. 2026Performance Analysis of Edge and In-Sensor AI Processors: A Comparative Reviewcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.