FormalEvolve: Neuro-Symbolic Evolutionary Search for Diverse Autoformalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autoformalization aims to produce formal statements that compile and faithfully preserve the intended meaning of informal mathematics. Yet standard single-output evaluation collapses this many-to-many structure into a single prediction. For downstream proving, this granularity is too coarse: a formal statement is not merely a faithful translation endpoint, but also a prover-facing interface whose structure can alter proof search under a fixed budget. We therefore recast autoformalization as budgeted test-time search: FormalEvolve maintains a compilation-feasible archive for reuse and returns a deduplicated, semantically accepted repertoire for evaluation and downstream proving. It expands the archive with LLM-driven mutation, crossover, bounded patch repair, and symbolic abstract syntax tree (AST) rewrites for structural diversity. Under a generator-call budget of T=100 with a fixed LLM semantic judge, FormalEvolve reaches SH@100 of 58.0% on CombiBench and 84.9% on ProofNet, improving over all no-archive controls while reducing the cross-problem concentration of semantic successes. Under a fixed B=64 prover budget, these repertoires improve theorem-complete proving over the matched no-archive control. Additional stronger-base statement-generation experiments show that archive-search gains persist with stronger seed and repair models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 22 references.
References · 18
- 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 763
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
- 2015Illuminating search spaces by mapping elitescited by 406
- 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 380
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
- 2022Autoformalization with Large Language Modelscited by 252
- 2023ProofNet: Autoformalizing and Formally Proving Undergraduate-Level Mathematicscited by 180
- 2025ShinkaEvolve: Towards Open-Ended And Sample-Efficient Program Evolutioncited by 146
- 2025Goedel-Prover-V2: Scaling Formal Theorem Proving with Scaffolded Data Synthesis and Self-Correctioncited by 140
- 2021Proof Artifact Co-training for Theorem Proving with Language Modelscited by 130
- 2024Lean Copilot: Large Language Models as Copilots for Theorem Proving in Leancited by 52
- 2025CombiBench: Benchmarking LLM Capability for Combinatorial Mathematicscited by 28
6 more
- 2025Aria: An Agent For Retrieval and Iterative Auto-Formalization via Dependency Graphcited by 18
- 2025ReForm: Reflective Autoformalization with Prospective Bounded Sequence Optimizationcited by 18
- 2025Kimina Lean Server: A High-Performance Lean Server for Large-Scale Verificationcited by 16
- 2025CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalizationcited by 15
- 2025Ineq-Comp: Benchmarking Human-Intuitive Compositional Reasoning in Automated Theorem Proving on Inequalitiescited by 8
- 2025EvolProver: Advancing Automated Theorem Proving by Evolving Formalized Problems via Symmetry and Difficultycited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.