mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Context Bootstrapped Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2603.18953 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) suffers from exploration inefficiency, where models struggle to generate successful rollouts, resulting in minimal learning signal. This challenge is particularly severe for tasks that require the acquisition of novel reasoning patterns or domain-specific knowledge. To address this, we propose Context Bootstrapped Reinforcement Learning (CBRL), which augments RLVR training by stochastically prepending few-shot demonstrations to training prompts. The injection probability follows a curriculum that starts high to bootstrap early exploration, then anneals to zero so the model must ultimately succeed without assistance. This forces the policy to internalize reasoning patterns from the demonstrations rather than relying on them at test time. We validate CBRL across two model families and five Reasoning Gym tasks. Our results demonstrate that CBRL consistently improves success rate, provides better exploration efficiency, and is algorithm-agnostic. We further demonstrate CBRL's practical applicability on Q, a domain-specific programming language that diverges significantly from mainstream language conventions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.

Builds on

24 of 28 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  5. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
  6. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
  7. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
  8. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
  9. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
  10. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
  11. 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 505
  12. 2025ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMscited by 377
12 more
  1. 2025Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Datacited by 323
  2. 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidancecited by 266
  3. 2025Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVRcited by 199
  4. 2025ARC-AGI-2: A New Challenge for Frontier AI Reasoning Systemscited by 171
  5. 2025REASONING GYM: Reasoning Environments for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 121
  6. 2025Curriculum Reinforcement Learning from Easy to Hard Tasks Improves LLM Reasoningcited by 89
  7. 2025On-Policy RL Meets Off-Policy Experts: Harmonizing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning via Dynamic Weightingcited by 88
  8. 2025BREAD: Branched Rollouts from Expert Anchors Bridge SFT & RL for Reasoningcited by 57
  9. 2025GHPO: Adaptive Guidance for Stable and Efficient LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 33
  10. 2025CodeRL+: Improving Code Generation via Reinforcement with Execution Semantics Alignmentcited by 22
  11. 2025Don't Tell the Answer, Truly Guide the Reasoning During RL Rolloutscited by 13
  12. 2025EvoCoT: Overcoming the Exploration Bottleneck in Reinforcement Learningcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.