Agent Control Protocol: Admission Control for Agent Actions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous agents can produce harmful behavioral patterns from individually valid requests -- a threat class per-request policy evaluation cannot address, because stateless engines evaluate each request in isolation. We present ACP, a temporal admission control protocol enforcing behavioral properties over execution traces via static risk scoring combined with stateful signals (anomaly accumulation, cooldown) through a LedgerQuerier abstraction. ACP blocks execution based on deterministic, history-aware risk scoring -- not anomaly detection. Under a 500-request workload where every request is individually valid (RS=35), a stateless engine approves all 500; ACP limits autonomous execution to 2 out of 500 (0.4%), escalating after 3 actions and denying after 11. We identify a state-mixing vulnerability in ACP-RISK-2.0 (cross-context false denials) and introduce ACP-RISK-3.0, scoping anomaly signals to PatternKey(agentID, capability, resource). Decision evaluation: 739-832 ns (p50); throughput 1,720,000 req/s. Safety and liveness model-checked via TLA+ (11 invariants + 4 temporal properties, 0 violations) across 4,294,930,695 distinct states. We formalize deviation collapse -- enforcement active but never exercised due to upstream constraints -- and introduce Boundary Activation Rate (BAR) as its detection mechanism. An adversary suppressing BAR to 0.00 is detected via DeltaBAR before collapse (BAR_C=1.00). N coordinated agents accumulate risk independently; coordination window CW_appr=2N with zero deviation: activity scales linearly, preventing superlinear amplification. ACP is Paper 1 of a 6-paper Agent Governance Series: P0 -- atomic decision boundaries; P2 -- behavioral drift detection (IML); P3/4 -- governance structure, fair allocation, and irreducibility; P5 -- runtime execution validity (RAM, arXiv:2604.22898); P6 -- operationalization of RAM.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineeringcited by 74
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commercecited by 8
- 2026Atomic Decision Boundaries: A Structural Requirement for Guaranteeing Execution-Time Admissibility in Autonomous Systemscited by 2
- 2026KYA: A Framework-Agnostic Trust Layer for Autonomous Systems with Verifiable Provenance and Hierarchical Policy Compositioncited by 0
- 2026KedgeFlow: A Programmable Control Plane for Enterprise AI Agentscited by 0
- 2026KedgeFlow: A Programmable Control Plane for Enterprise AI Agents10 Oct 2026
- 2026KYA: A Framework-Agnostic Trust Layer for Autonomous Systems with Verifiable Provenance and Hierarchical Policy Composition25 May 2026
- 2026Atomic Decision Boundaries: A Structural Requirement for Guaranteeing Execution-Time Admissibility in Autonomous Systems19 Apr 2026
- 2026SoK: Security of Autonomous LLM Agents in Agentic Commerce15 Apr 2026
- 2026Externalization in LLM Agents: A Unified Review of Memory, Skills, Protocols and Harness Engineering9 Apr 2026