mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Onto-Relational-Sophic Framework for Governing Synthetic Minds

arXiv 2603.18633 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.ETcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence, from task-specific systems to foundation models exhibiting broad, flexible competence across reasoning, creative synthesis, and social interaction, has outpaced the conceptual and governance frameworks designed to manage it. Current regulatory paradigms, anchored in a tool-centric worldview, address algorithmic bias and transparency but leave unanswered foundational questions about what increasingly capable synthetic minds are, how societies should relate to them, and the normative principles that should guide their development. Here we introduce the Onto-Relational-Sophic (ORS) framework, grounded in Cyberism philosophy, which offers integrated answers to these challenges through three pillars: (1) a Cyber-Physical-Social-Thinking (CPST) ontology that defines the mode of being for synthetic minds as irreducibly multi-dimensional rather than purely computational; (2) a graded spectrum of digital personhood providing a pragmatic relational taxonomy beyond binary person-or-tool classifications; and (3) Cybersophy, a wisdom-oriented axiology synthesizing virtue ethics, consequentialism, and relational approaches to guide governance. We apply the framework to emergent scenarios including autonomous research agents, AI-mediated healthcare, and agentic AI ecosystems, demonstrating its capacity to generate proportionate, adaptive governance recommendations. The ORS framework charts a path from narrow technical alignment toward comprehensive philosophical foundations for the synthetic minds already among us.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 49 references.

References · 10

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  4. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  5. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
  6. 2018Scalable agent alignment via reward modeling: a research directioncited by 447
  7. 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 258
  8. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 135
  9. 2019The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelinescited by 129
  10. 2025Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025cited by 64

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Soul Computing: A Theoretical Framework and Technical Architecture for Intelligent Agents with Independent Consciousness
  2. 2025A Pragmatic View of AI Personhood
  3. 2026Socially Grounded Agentic AI: Coordinating Plural Perspectives through Social Theory
  4. 2025Ontologies in Design: How Imagining a Tree Reveals Possibilites and Assumptions in Large Language Models
  5. 2025Black Box Deployed -- Functional Criteria for Artificial Moral Agents in the LLM Era
  6. 2026The Agent Use of Agent Beings: Agent Cybernetics Is the Missing Science of Foundation Agents
  7. 2025Socio-technical aspects of Agentic AI
  8. 2022Designing Ecosystems of Intelligence from First Principles