AutoScreen-FW: An LLM-based Framework for Resume Screening
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Corporate recruiters often need to screen many resumes within a limited time, which increases their burden and may cause suitable candidates to be overlooked. To address these challenges, prior work has explored LLM-based automated resume screening. However, some methods rely on commercial LLMs, which may pose data privacy risks. Moreover, since companies typically do not make resumes with evaluation results publicly available, it remains unclear which resume samples should be used during learning to improve an LLM's judgment performance. To address these problems, we propose AutoScreen-FW, an LLM-based locally and automatically resume screening framework. AutoScreen-FW uses several methods to select a small set of representative resume samples. These samples are used for in-context learning together with a persona description and evaluation criteria, enabling open-source LLMs to act as a career advisor and evaluate unseen resumes. Experiments with multiple ground truths show that the open-source LLM judges consistently outperform GPT-5-nano. Under one ground truth setting, it also surpass GPT-5-mini. Although it is slightly weaker than GPT-5-mini under other ground-truth settings, it runs substantially faster per resume than commercial GPT models. These findings indicate the potential for deploying AutoScreen-FW locally in companies to support efficient screening while reducing recruiters' burden.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2026.
Builds on
24 of 37 references.
References · 24
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
- 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 648
- 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 494
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
- 2022Active Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 196
- 2023In-Context Impersonation Reveals Large Language Models' Strengths and Biasescited by 155
12 more
- 2023Unified Demonstration Retriever for In-Context Learningcited by 142
- 2024Large Language Models Meet NLP: A Surveycited by 103
- 2023Wider and Deeper LLM Networks are Fairer LLM Evaluatorscited by 94
- 2023Few-shot In-context Learning for Knowledge Base Question Answeringcited by 74
- 2023Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search?cited by 54
- 2023ICL-D3IE: In-Context Learning with Diverse Demonstrations Updating for Document Information Extractioncited by 38
- 2023Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Surveycited by 30
- 2024Identifying and Improving Disability Bias in GPT-Based Resume Screeningcited by 28
- 2023Are Emily and Greg Still More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? Investigating Algorithmic Hiring Bias in the Era of ChatGPTcited by 24
- 2025AI Hiring with LLMs: A Context-Aware and Explainable Multi-Agent Framework for Resume Screeningcited by 20
- 2024Leveraging Large Language Models for Relevance Judgments in Legal Case Retrievalcited by 16
- 2023More Samples or More Prompts? Exploring Effective In-Context Sampling for LLM Few-Shot Prompt Engineeringcited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.