mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ConGA: Guidelines for Contextual Gender Annotation. A Framework for Annotating Gender in Machine Translation

arXiv 2603.17962 ↗First posted 18 Mar 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Handling gender across languages remains a persistent challenge for Machine Translation (MT) and Large Language Models (LLMs), especially when translating from gender-neutral languages into morphologically gendered ones, such as English to Italian. English largely omits grammatical gender, while Italian requires explicit agreement across multiple grammatical categories. This asymmetry often leads MT systems to default to masculine forms, reinforcing bias and reducing translation accuracy. To address this issue, we present the Contextual Gender Annotation (ConGA) framework, a linguistically grounded set of guidelines for word-level gender annotation. The scheme distinguishes between semantic gender in English through three tags, Masculine (M), Feminine (F), and Ambiguous (A), and grammatical gender realisation in Italian (Masculine (M), Feminine (F)), combined with entity-level identifiers for cross-sentence tracking. We apply ConGA to the gENder-IT dataset, creating a gold-standard resource for evaluating gender bias in translation. Our results reveal systematic masculine overuse and inconsistent feminine realisation, highlighting persistent limitations of current MT systems. By combining fine-grained linguistic annotation with quantitative evaluation, this work offers both a methodology and a benchmark for building more gender-aware and multilingual NLP systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.

Builds on

12 of 30 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  2. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
  3. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 247
  4. 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
  5. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
  6. 2019Getting Gender Right in Neural Machine Translationcited by 98
  7. 2019Equalizing Gender Biases in Neural Machine Translation with Word Embeddings Techniquescited by 65
  8. 2019On Measuring Gender Bias in Translation of Gender-neutral Pronounscited by 59
  9. 2020Gender in Danger? Evaluating Speech Translation Technology on the MuST-SHE Corpuscited by 57
  10. 2019Lost in Translation: Loss and Decay of Linguistic Richness in Machine Translationcited by 45
  11. 2018Gender Aware Spoken Language Translation Applied to English-Arabiccited by 18
  12. 2021GENder-IT: An Annotated English-Italian Parallel Challenge Set for Cross-Linguistic Natural Gender Phenomenacited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.