mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Minimum-Action Learning: Energy-Constrained Symbolic Model Selection for Physical Law Identification from Noisy Data

arXiv 2603.16951 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying physical laws from noisy observational data is a central challenge in scientific machine learning. We present Minimum-Action Learning (MAL), a framework that selects symbolic force laws from a pre-specified basis library by minimizing a Triple-Action functional combining trajectory reconstruction, architectural sparsity, and energy-conservation enforcement. A wide-stencil acceleration-matching technique reduces noise variance by 10,000x, transforming an intractable problem (SNR ~0.02) into a learnable one (SNR ~1.6); this preprocessing is the critical enabler shared by all methods tested, including SINDy variants. On two benchmarks -- Kepler gravity and Hooke's law -- MAL recovers the correct force law with Kepler exponent p = 3.01 +/- 0.01 at ~0.07 kWh (40% reduction vs. prediction-error-only baselines). The raw correct-basis rate is 40% for Kepler and 90% for Hooke; an energy-conservation-based criterion discriminates the true force law in all cases, yielding 100% pipeline-level identification. Basis library sensitivity experiments show that near-confounders degrade selection (20% with added r^{-2.5} and r^{-1.5}), while distant additions are harmless, and the conservation diagnostic remains informative even when the correct basis is absent. Direct comparison with noise-robust SINDy variants, Hamiltonian Neural Networks, and Lagrangian Neural Networks confirms MAL's distinct niche: interpretable, energy-constrained model selection that combines symbolic basis identification with dynamical rollout validation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2026.

Builds on

11 of 46 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
  2. 2019Hamiltonian Neural Networkscited by 702
  3. 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 561
  4. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  5. 2020Lagrangian Neural Networkscited by 388
  6. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 335
  7. 2018SNAS: Stochastic Neural Architecture Searchcited by 288
  8. 2021Ensemble-SINDy: Robust sparse model discovery in the low-data, high-noise limit, with active learning and controlcited by 134
  9. 2022Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learningcited by 71
  10. 2021Noether's Learning Dynamics: Role of Symmetry Breaking in Neural Networkscited by 47
  11. 2024Noether's razor: Learning Conserved Quantitiescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.