mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Proactive Rejection and Grounded Execution: A Dual-Stage Intent Analysis Paradigm for Safe and Efficient AIoT Smart Homes

arXiv 2603.16207 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) transition from information providers to embodied agents in the Internet of Things (IoT), they face significant challenges regarding reliability and interaction efficiency. Direct execution of LLM-generated commands often leads to entity hallucinations (e.g., trying to control non-existent devices). Meanwhile, existing iterative frameworks (e.g., SAGE) suffer from the Interaction Frequency Dilemma, oscillating between reckless execution and excessive user questioning. To address these issues, we propose a Dual-Stage Intent-Aware (DS-IA) Framework. This framework separates high-level user intent understanding from low-level physical execution. Specifically, Stage 1 serves as a semantic firewall to filter out invalid instructions and resolve vague commands by checking the current state of the home. Stage 2 then employs a deterministic cascade verifier-a strict, step-by-step rule checker that verifies the room, device, and capability in sequence-to ensure the action is actually physically possible before execution. Extensive experiments on the HomeBench and SAGE benchmarks demonstrate that DS-IA achieves an Exact Match (EM) rate of 58.56% (outperforming baselines by over 28%) and improves the rejection rate of invalid instructions to 87.04%. Evaluations on the SAGE benchmark further reveal that DS-IA resolves the Interaction Frequency Dilemma by balancing proactive querying with state-based inference. Specifically, it boosts the Autonomous Success Rate (resolving tasks without unnecessary user intervention) from 42.86% to 71.43%, while maintaining high precision in identifying irreducible ambiguities that truly necessitate human clarification. These results underscore the framework's ability to minimize user disturbance through accurate environmental grounding.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

Builds on

11 of 15 references.

References · 11

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  3. 2023Robots That Ask For Help: Uncertainty Alignment for Large Language Model Plannerscited by 298
  4. 2024Intention Analysis Makes LLMs A Good Jailbreak Defendercited by 64
  5. 2024IoT-LLM: a framework for enhancing Large Language Model reasoning from real-world sensor datacited by 18
  6. 2025HomeBench: Evaluating LLMs in Smart Homes with Valid and Invalid Instructions Across Single and Multiple Devicescited by 15
  7. 2024IoT-LM: Large Multisensory Language Models for the Internet of Thingscited by 14
  8. 2023"Get ready for a party": Exploring smarter smart spaces with help from large language modelscited by 10
  9. 2025AmbiK: Dataset of Ambiguous Tasks in Kitchen Environmentcited by 8
  10. 2025ChatIoT: Large Language Model-based Security Assistant for Internet of Things with Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 4
  11. 2024Integrating Disambiguation and User Preferences into Large Language Models for Robot Motion Planningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.