mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Interpretable Context Methodology: Folder Structure as Agentic Architecture

arXiv 2603.16021 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Current approaches to AI agent orchestration typically involve building multi-agent frameworks that manage context passing, memory, error handling, and step coordination through code. These frameworks work well for complex, concurrent systems. But for sequential workflows where a human reviews output at each step, they introduce engineering overhead that the problem does not require. This paper presents Model Workspace Protocol (MWP), a method that replaces framework-level orchestration with filesystem structure. Numbered folders represent stages. Plain markdown files carry the prompts and context that tell a single AI agent what role to play at each step. Local scripts handle the mechanical work that does not need AI at all. The result is a system where one agent, reading the right files at the right moment, does the work that would otherwise require a multi-agent framework. This approach applies ideas from Unix pipeline design, modular decomposition, multi-pass compilation, and literate programming to the specific problem of structuring context for AI agents. The protocol is open source under the MIT license.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2026.

Builds on

13 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation16 Aug

Other references · 12

  1. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,376
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,221
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
  5. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,117
  6. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,541
  7. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,412
  8. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,313
  9. 2023LongLLMLingua: Accelerating and Enhancing LLMs in Long Context Scenarios via Prompt Compressioncited by 447
  10. 2023LLMLingua: Compressing Prompts for Accelerated Inference of Large Language Modelscited by 284
  11. 2021AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Promptscited by 266
  12. 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 183

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Codified Context: Infrastructure for AI Agents in a Complex Codebase
  2. 2026From Tool Orchestration to Code Execution: A Study of MCP Design Choices
  3. 2025Agent READMEs: An Empirical Study of Context Files for Agentic Coding
  4. 2026GraphBit: A Graph-based Agentic Framework for Non-Linear Agent Orchestration
  5. 2026Compiling Agentic Workflows into LLM Weights: Near-Frontier Quality at Two Orders of Magnitude Less Cost
  6. 2026AgentSPEX: An Agent SPecification and EXecution Language
  7. 2026A Phased Workflow for Operating LLM-Based Coding Agents
  8. 2025Formalizing the Safety, Security, and Functional Properties of Agentic AI Systems