mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How to Achieve Prototypical Birth and Death for OOD Detection?

arXiv 2603.15650 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection is crucial for the secure deployment of machine learning models, and prototype-based learning methods are among the mainstream strategies for achieving OOD detection. Existing prototype-based learning methods generally rely on a fixed number of prototypes. This static assumption fails to adapt to the inherent complexity differences across various categories. Currently, there is still a lack of a mechanism that can adaptively adjust the number of prototypes based on data complexity. Inspired by the processes of cell birth and death in biology, we propose a novel method named PID (Prototype bIrth and Death) to adaptively adjust the prototype count based on data complexity. This method relies on two dynamic mechanisms during the training process: prototype birth and prototype death. The birth mechanism instantiates new prototypes in data regions with insufficient representation by identifying the overload level of existing prototypes, thereby meticulously capturing intra-class substructures. Conversely, the death mechanism reinforces the decision boundary by pruning prototypes with ambiguous class boundaries through evaluating their discriminability. Through birth and death, the number of prototypes can be dynamically adjusted according to the data complexity, leading to the learning of more compact and better-separated In-Distribution (ID) embeddings, which significantly enhances the capability to detect OOD samples. Experiments demonstrate that our dynamic method, PID, significantly outperforms existing methods on benchmarks such as CIFAR-100, achieving State-of-the-Art (SOTA) performance, especially on the FPR95 metric.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

31 of 43 references.

References · 31

  1. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  3. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  4. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  5. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,485
  6. 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,355
  7. 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,328
  8. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
  9. 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
  10. 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 640
  11. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 600
  12. 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
19 more
  1. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 436
  2. 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 405
  3. 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 405
  4. 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 339
  5. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 333
  6. 2021SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detectioncited by 264
  7. 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
  8. 2021A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detectioncited by 207
  9. 2015TurkerGaze: Crowdsourcing Saliency with Webcam based Eye Trackingcited by 165
  10. 2023Non-Parametric Outlier Synthesiscited by 129
  11. 2022How to Exploit Hyperspherical Embeddings for Out-of-Distribution Detection?cited by 128
  12. 2021Understanding Failures in Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Generative Modelscited by 89
  13. 2022GOOD-D: On Unsupervised Graph Out-Of-Distribution Detectioncited by 47
  14. 2021Energy-Based Open-World Uncertainty Modeling for Confidence Calibrationcited by 46
  15. 2021Modeling Discriminative Representations for Out-of-Domain Detection with Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 42
  16. 2021Open-world Machine Learning: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 34
  17. 2024DPU: Dynamic Prototype Updating for Multimodal Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 29
  18. 2022Contrastive Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 24
  19. 2025OODD: Test-time Out-of-Distribution Detection with Dynamic Dictionarycited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.