mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine-tuning MLLMs Without Forgetting Is Easier Than You Think

arXiv 2603.14493 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2026cs.CV cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

The paper demonstrate that simple adjustments of the fine-tuning recipes of multimodal large language models (MLLM) are sufficient to mitigate catastrophic forgetting. On visual question answering, we design a 2x2 experimental framework to assess model performance across in-distribution and out-of-distribution image and text inputs. Our results show that appropriate regularization, such as constraining the number of trainable parameters or adopting a low learning rate, effectively prevents forgetting when dealing with out-of-distribution images. However, we uncover a distinct form of forgetting in settings with in-distribution images and out-of-distribution text. We attribute this forgetting as task-specific overfitting and address this issue by introducing a data-hybrid training strategy that combines datasets and tasks. Finally, we demonstrate that this approach naturally extends to continual learning, outperforming existing methods with complex auxiliary mechanisms. In general, our findings challenge the prevailing assumptions by highlighting the inherent robustness of MLLMs and providing practical guidelines for adapting them while preserving their general capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2026.

Builds on

18 of 49 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Step15 Nov

Other references · 17

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  3. 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,442
  4. 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 711
  5. 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 610
  6. 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 296
  7. 2022Fine-tuned Language Models are Continual Learnerscited by 152
  8. 2024LoRA vs Full Fine-tuning: An Illusion of Equivalencecited by 102
  9. 2021The Evolution of Out-of-Distribution Robustness Throughout Fine-Tuningcited by 74
  10. 2024Scaling Laws for Forgetting When Fine-Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 36
  11. 2024ModalPrompt: Towards Efficient Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning with Dual-Modality Guided Promptcited by 29
  12. 2025HiDe-LLaVA: Hierarchical Decoupling for Continual Instruction Tuning of Multimodal Large Language Modelcited by 29
5 more
  1. 2025MLLM-CL: Continual Learning for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 21
  2. 2024Learn from Downstream and Be Yourself in Multimodal Large Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 19
  3. 2024Towards Effective and Efficient Continual Pre-training of Large Language Modelscited by 13
  4. 2024Chained Tuning Leads to Biased Forgettingcited by 3
  5. 2024The Berkeley Single Cell Computational Microscopy (BSCCM) Datasetcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Model Tailor: Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Multi-modal Large Language Models
  2. 2025Keeping Yourself is Important in Downstream Tuning Multimodal Large Language Model
  3. 2023Investigating the Catastrophic Forgetting in Multimodal Large Language Models
  4. 2024Improving Multimodal Large Language Models Using Continual Learning
  5. 2025When Continue Learning Meets Multimodal Large Language Model: A Survey
  6. 2026Model-Dowser: Data-Free Importance Probing to Mitigate Catastrophic Forgetting in Multimodal Large Language Models
  7. 2024Skipping Computations in Multimodal LLMs
  8. 2026Hidden Forgetting in Continual Multimodal Learning: When Accuracy Survives but Grounding Fails