How to find expressible and trainable parameterized quantum circuits?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Whether parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) can be systematically constructed to be both trainable and expressive remains an open question. Highly expressive PQCs often exhibit barren plateaus, while several trainable alternatives admit efficient classical simulation. We address this question by deriving a finite-sample, dimension-independent concentration bound for estimating the variance of a PQC cost function, yielding explicit trainability guarantees. Across commonly used ans"atze, we observe an anticorrelation between trainability and expressibility, consistent with theoretical insights. Building on this observation, we propose a property-based ansatz-search framework for identifying circuits that combine trainability and expressibility. We demonstrate its practical viability on a real quantum computer and apply it to variational quantum algorithms. We identify quantum neural network ans"atze with improved effective dimension using over 6 × fewer parameters, and for VQE on H2 we achieve UCCSD-like accuracy at substantially reduced circuit complexity.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2026.
Builds on
29 of 95 references.
References · 29
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
- 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 624
- 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 377
- 2019Why gradient clipping accelerates training: A theoretical justification for adaptivitycited by 335
- 2018An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Trainingcited by 268
- 2020Noise-Induced Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 192
- 2021Connecting ansatz expressibility to gradient magnitudes and barren plateauscited by 180
- 2019Efficient Learning for Deep Quantum Neural Networkscited by 160
- 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 130
- 2020Absence of Barren Plateaus in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 124
- 2021QuantumNAS: Noise-Adaptive Search for Robust Quantum Circuitscited by 97
17 more
- 2023Revisiting Gradient Clipping: Stochastic bias and tight convergence guaranteescited by 83
- 2020On the Generalization Benefit of Noise in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 81
- 2020Quantum circuit architecture search for variational quantum algorithmscited by 81
- 2023Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?cited by 78
- 2021Quantum Architecture Search via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
- 2022Escaping from the Barren Plateau via Gaussian Initializations in Deep Variational Quantum Circuitscited by 42
- 2024Curriculum reinforcement learning for quantum architecture search under hardware errorscited by 37
- 2020On barren plateaus and cost function locality in variational quantum algorithmscited by 36
- 2024Quantum Architecture Search: A Surveycited by 31
- 2024On the relation between trainability and dequantization of variational quantum learning modelscited by 24
- 2022Quantum Neural Architecture Search with Quantum Circuits Metric and Bayesian Optimizationcited by 16
- 2022Automated Quantum Circuit Design with Nested Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 16
- 2022Stochastic noise can be helpful for variational quantum algorithmscited by 16
- 2022BEINIT: Avoiding Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 15
- 2024Investigating and Mitigating Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Circuits: A Surveycited by 9
- 2025Efficient Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification: Overcoming Hardware Constraintscited by 5
- 2026Quantum Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.