Multifidelity Surrogate Modeling of Depressurized Loss of Forced Cooling in High-temperature Gas Reactors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are widely used to analyze nuclear reactor transients, but are computationally expensive when exploring large parameter spaces. Multifidelity surrogate models offer an approach to reduce cost by combining information from simulations of varying resolution. In this work, several multifidelity machine learning methods were evaluated for predicting the time to onset of natural circulation (ONC) and the temperature after ONC for a high-temperature gas reactor (HTGR) depressurized loss of forced cooling transient. A CFD model was developed in Ansys Fluent to generate 1000 simulation samples at each fidelity level, with low and medium-fidelity datasets produced by systematically coarsening the high-fidelity mesh. Multiple surrogate approaches were investigated, including multifidelity Gaussian processes and several neural network architectures, and validated on analytical benchmark functions before application to the ONC dataset. The results show that performance depends strongly on the informativeness of the input variables and the relationship between fidelity levels. Models trained using dominant inputs identified through prior sensitivity analysis consistently outperformed models trained on the full input set. The low- and high-fidelity pairing produced stronger performance than configurations involving medium-fidelity data, and two-fidelity configurations generally matched or exceeded three-fidelity counterparts at equivalent computational cost. Among the methods evaluated, multifidelity GP provided the most robust performance across input configurations, achieving excellent metrics for both time to ONC and temperature after ONC, while neural network approaches achieved comparable accuracy with substantially lower training times.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2026.
Builds on
10 of 66 references.
References · 10
- 2018Survey of multifidelity methods in uncertainty propagation, inference, and optimizationcited by 142
- 2021Multi-fidelity regression using artificial neural networks: efficient approximation of parameter-dependent output quantitiescited by 31
- 2023A DeepONet multi-fidelity approach for residual learning in reduced order modelingcited by 14
- 2022Analytical Benchmark Problems for Multifidelity Optimization Methodscited by 7
- 2021Machine learning-assisted surrogate construction for full-core fuel performance analysiscited by 6
- 2021NEORL: NeuroEvolution Optimization with Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2025Data-Efficient Deep Operator Network for Unsteady Flow: A Multi-Fidelity Approach with Physics-Guided Subsamplingcited by 5
- 2022Model Calibration of the Liquid Mercury Spallation Target using Evolutionary Neural Networks and Sparse Polynomial Expansionscited by 4
- 2024Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian modelscited by 4
- 2021Assessing the Performance of an Adaptive Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Process with Noisy Training Data: A Statistical Analysiscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.