mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Shapes are not enough: CONSERVAttack and its use for finding vulnerabilities and uncertainties in machine learning applications

arXiv 2603.13970 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2026cs.LG hep-excited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In High Energy Physics, as in many other fields of science, the application of machine learning techniques has been crucial in advancing our understanding of fundamental phenomena. Increasingly, deep learning models are applied to analyze both simulated and experimental data. In most experiments, a rigorous regime of testing for physically motivated systematic uncertainties is in place. The numerical evaluation of these tests for differences between the data on the one side and simulations on the other side quantifies the effect of potential sources of mismodelling on the machine learning output. In addition, thorough comparisons of marginal distributions and (linear) feature correlations between data and simulation in "control regions" are applied. However, the guidance by physical motivation, and the need to constrain comparisons to specific regions, does not guarantee that all possible sources of deviations have been accounted for. We therefore propose a new adversarial attack - the CONSERVAttack - designed to exploit the remaining space of hypothetical deviations between simulation and data after the above mentioned tests. The resulting adversarial perturbations are consistent within the uncertainty bounds - evading standard validation checks - while successfully fooling the underlying model. We further propose strategies to mitigate such vulnerabilities and argue that robustness to adversarial effects must be considered when interpreting results from deep learning in particle physics.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2026.

Builds on

13 of 27 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,576
  4. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
  5. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  6. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  7. 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
  8. 2023Recent Advancements in End-to-End Autonomous Driving using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 103
  9. 2019Distributionally Robust Optimization: A Reviewcited by 76
  10. 2023How Deep Learning Sees the World: A Survey on Adversarial Attacks & Defensescited by 66
  11. 2021Adversarial Attacks for Tabular Data: Application to Fraud Detection and Imbalanced Datacited by 45
  12. 2025Enforcing Fundamental Relations via Adversarial Attacks on Input Parameter Correlationscited by 5
1 more
  1. 2025MiniFool -- Physics-Constraint-Aware Minimizer-Based Adversarial Attacks in Deep Neural Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.