mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causal Attribution via Activation Patching

arXiv 2603.13652 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attribution methods for Vision Transformers (ViTs) aim to identify image regions that influence model predictions, but producing faithful and well-localized attributions remains challenging. Existing attribution methods face several limitations, with gradient-based, relevance-propagation, and attention-based methods relying on local approximations, while perturbation or optimization-based methods intervene on inputs, tokens, or surrogates rather than internal patch representations. The key challenge is that class-relevant evidence is formed through interactions between patch tokens across layers; methods that operate only on input changes, attention weights, or backward relevance signals may therefore provide indirect proxies for patch importance rather than directly testing the predictive effect of contextualized patch representations. We propose Causal Attribution via Activation Patching (CAAP), which estimates the contribution of individual image patches to the ViT's prediction by directly intervening on internal activations rather than using learned masks or synthetic perturbation patterns. For each patch, CAAP inserts the corresponding source-image activations into a neutral target context over an intermediate range of layers and uses the resulting target-class score as the attribution signal. The resulting attribution map reflects the causal contribution of patch-associated internal representations on the model's prediction. The causal intervention serves as a principled measure of patch influence by capturing semantic evidence after initial representation formation, while avoiding late-layer global mixing that can reduce spatial specificity. Across multiple ViT backbones and standard metrics, CAAP consistently outperforms existing methods in various settings and produces more faithful and localized attributions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.

Builds on

30 of 41 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  7. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  9. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  10. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  11. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  12. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
18 more
  1. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
  2. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  3. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  4. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
  5. 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 417
  6. 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 328
  7. 2015What's the Point: Semantic Segmentation with Point Supervisioncited by 297
  8. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  9. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  10. 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 194
  11. 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 98
  12. 2019Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspectivecited by 77
  13. 2022Grad-SAM: Explaining Transformers via Gradient Self-Attention Mapscited by 42
  14. 2023ImageNet-Hard: The Hardest Images Remaining from a Study of the Power of Zoom and Spatial Biases in Image Classificationcited by 33
  15. 2023AtMan: Understanding Transformer Predictions Through Memory Efficient Attention Manipulationcited by 30
  16. 2022ViT-CX: Causal Explanation of Vision Transformerscited by 27
  17. 2024Dissecting Query-Key Interaction in Vision Transformerscited by 12
  18. 2024LibraGrad: Balancing Gradient Flow for Universally Better Vision Transformer Attributionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.