mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Privacy-Preserving Federated Fraud Detection in Payment Transactions with NVIDIA FLARE

arXiv 2603.13617 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.CEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fraud-related financial losses continue to rise, while regulatory, privacy, and data-sovereignty constraints increasingly limit the feasibility of centralized fraud detection systems. Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for enabling collaborative model training across institutions without sharing raw transaction data. Yet, its practical effectiveness under realistic, non-IID financial data distributions remains insufficiently validated. In this work, we present a multi-institution, industry-oriented proof-of-concept study evaluating federated anomaly detection for payment transactions using the NVIDIA FLARE framework. We simulate a realistic federation of heterogeneous financial institutions, each observing distinct fraud typologies and operating under strict data isolation. Using a deep neural network trained via federated averaging (FedAvg), we demonstrate that federated models achieve a mean F1-score of 0.903 - substantially outperforming locally trained models (0.643) and closely approaching centralized training performance (0.925), while preserving full data sovereignty. We further analyze convergence behavior, showing that strong performance is achieved within 10 federated communication rounds, highlighting the operational viability of FL in latency- and cost-sensitive financial environments. To support deployment in regulated settings, we evaluate model interpretability using Shapley-based feature attribution and confirm that federated models rely on semantically coherent, domain-relevant decision signals. Finally, we incorporate sample-level differential privacy via DP-SGD and demonstrate favorable privacy-utility trade-offs...

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.

Builds on

10 of 17 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  5. 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,531
  6. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
  7. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  8. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  9. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
  10. 2022NVIDIA FLARE: Federated Learning from Simulation to Real-Worldcited by 78

Built on by

Not cited yet.