Is Human Annotation Necessary? Iterative MBR Distillation for Error Span Detection in Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Error Span Detection (ESD) is a crucial subtask in Machine Translation (MT) evaluation, aiming to identify the location and severity of translation errors. While fine-tuning models on human-annotated data improves ESD performance, acquiring such data is expensive and prone to inconsistencies among annotators. To address this, we propose a novel self-evolution framework based on Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding, named Iterative MBR Distillation for ESD, which eliminates the reliance on human annotations by leveraging an off-the-shelf LLM to generate pseudo-labels. Extensive experiments on the WMT Metrics Shared Task datasets demonstrate that models trained solely on these self-generated pseudo-labels outperform both unadapted base model and supervised baselines trained on human annotations at the system and span levels, while maintaining competitive sentence-level performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.
Builds on
20 of 46 references.
References · 20
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,598
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
- 2024SWIFT:A Scalable lightWeight Infrastructure for Fine-Tuningcited by 355
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
- 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 264
- 2023GEMBA-MQM: Detecting Translation Quality Error Spans with GPT-4cited by 146
- 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 138
- 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
- 2023Ties Matter: Meta-Evaluating Modern Metrics with Pairwise Accuracy and Tie Calibrationcited by 74
8 more
- 2021A Statistical Analysis of Summarization Evaluation Metrics using Resampling Methodscited by 72
- 2024Error Span Annotation: A Balanced Approach for Human Evaluation of Machine Translationcited by 62
- 2024TEaR: Improving LLM-based Machine Translation with Systematic Self-Refinementcited by 39
- 2024Improving Statistical Significance in Human Evaluation of Automatic Metrics via Soft Pairwise Accuracycited by 25
- 2024Mitigating Metric Bias in Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 16
- 2025Has Machine Translation Evaluation Achieved Human Parity? The Human Reference and the Limits of Progresscited by 10
- 2025MetricX-25 and GemSpanEval: Google Translate Submissions to the WMT25 Evaluation Shared Taskcited by 10
- 2024Diversity Explains Inference Scaling Laws: Through a Case Study of Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.