Foundation-Model Surrogates Enable Data-Efficient Active Learning for Materials Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active learning (AL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for accelerating materials discovery by iteratively steering experiments toward promising candidates, reducing the number of costly synthesis-and-characterization cycles needed to identify optimal materials. However, current AL relies predominantly on Gaussian Process (GP) and Random Forest (RF) surrogates, which suffer from complementary limitations: GP underfits complex composition-property landscapes due to rigid kernel assumptions, while RF produces unreliable heuristic uncertainty estimates in small-data regimes. This small-data challenge is pervasive in materials science, making reliable surrogate modeling extremely difficult with models trained from scratch on each new dataset. Here we propose In-Context Active Learning (ICAL), which addresses this bottleneck by replacing conventional surrogates with TabPFN, a transformer-based foundation model (FM) pre-trained on millions of synthetic regression tasks to meta-learn a universal prior over tabular data, upon which TabPFN performs principled Bayesian inference in a single forward pass without dataset-specific retraining, delivering strong small-data regression performance and well-calibrated predictive uncertainty (required for effective AL). We benchmark ICAL against GP and RF across 10 materials datasets and TabPFN wins on 8 out of 10 datasets, achieving a mean saving of 52% in extra evaluations relative to GP and 29.77% relative to RF. Cross-validation analysis confirms that TabPFN's advantage stems from superior uncertainty calibration, achieving the lowest Negative Log-Likelihood and Area Under the Sparsification Error curve among all surrogates. These results demonstrate that pre-trained FMs can serve as effective surrogates for active learning, enabling data-efficient discovery across diverse materials systems and small-data experimental sciences.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2026.
Builds on
6 of 56 references.
References · 6
- 2021Benchmarking the Performance of Bayesian Optimization across Multiple Experimental Materials Science Domainscited by 48
- 2024A Survey of Generative AI for de novo Drug Design: New Frontiers in Molecule and Protein Generationcited by 29
- 2021Bayesian Optimization in Materials Science: A Surveycited by 9
- 2023Accelerating material discovery with a threshold-driven hybrid acquisition policy-based Bayesian optimizationcited by 3
- 2025Deep Gaussian Process-based Cost-Aware Batch Bayesian Optimization for Complex Materials Design Campaignscited by 2
- 2025When Active Learning Fails, Uncalibrated Out of Distribution Uncertainty Quantification Might Be the Problemcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026TabPFN-3: Technical Reportcited by 17
- 2026TabPFN-3: Technical Report13 May 2026