mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Accelerating material discovery with a threshold-driven hybrid acquisition policy-based Bayesian optimization

arXiv 2311.09591 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2023cs.LG cond-mat.mtrl-sci stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Advancements in materials play a crucial role in technological progress. However, the process of discovering and developing materials with desired properties is often impeded by substantial experimental costs, extensive resource utilization, and lengthy development periods. To address these challenges, modern approaches often employ machine learning (ML) techniques such as Bayesian Optimization (BO), which streamline the search for optimal materials by iteratively selecting experiments that are most likely to yield beneficial results. However, traditional BO methods, while beneficial, often struggle with balancing the trade-off between exploration and exploitation, leading to sub-optimal performance in material discovery processes. This paper introduces a novel Threshold-Driven UCB-EI Bayesian Optimization (TDUE-BO) method, which dynamically integrates the strengths of Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) and Expected Improvement (EI) acquisition functions to optimize the material discovery process. Unlike the classical BO, our method focuses on efficiently navigating the high-dimensional material design space (MDS). TDUE-BO begins with an exploration-focused UCB approach, ensuring a comprehensive initial sweep of the MDS. As the model gains confidence, indicated by reduced uncertainty, it transitions to the more exploitative EI method, focusing on promising areas identified earlier. The UCB-to-EI switching policy dictated guided through continuous monitoring of the model uncertainty during each step of sequential sampling results in navigating through the MDS more efficiently while ensuring rapid convergence. The effectiveness of TDUE-BO is demonstrated through its application on three different material datasets, showing significantly better approximation and optimization performance over the EI and UCB-based BO methods in terms of the RMSE scores and convergence efficiency, respectively.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2023.

Builds on

11 of 52 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  2. 2016Bayesian Optimization with Safety Constraints: Safe and Automatic Parameter Tuning in Roboticscited by 134
  3. 2015Bayesian optimization for materials designcited by 78
  4. 2019Greed is Good: Exploration and Exploitation Trade-offs in Bayesian Optimisationcited by 47
  5. 2021Benchmarking the Performance of Bayesian Optimization across Multiple Experimental Materials Science Domainscited by 46
  6. 2019Bayesian Optimization using Deep Gaussian Processescited by 22
  7. 2016Bayesian Optimization with Exponential Convergencecited by 18
  8. 2019A hierarchical expected improvement method for Bayesian optimizationcited by 13
  9. 2021Towards Futuristic Autonomous Experimentation--A Surprise-Reacting Sequential Experiment Policycited by 4
  10. 2023Guiding the Sequential Experiments in Autonomous Experimentation Platforms through EI-based Bayesian Optimization and Bayesian Model Averagingcited by 3
  11. 2021Tuning Confidence Bound for Stochastic Bandits with Bandit Distancecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.