Cascade: Composing Software-Hardware Attack Gadgets for Adversarial Threat Amplification in Compound AI Systems
On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security
Abstract (arXiv)
Rapid progress in generative AI has given rise to Compound AI systems - pipelines comprised of multiple large language models (LLM), software tools and database systems. Compound AI systems are constructed on a layered traditional software stack running on a distributed hardware infrastructure. Many of the diverse software components are vulnerable to traditional security flaws documented in the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) database, while the underlying distributed hardware infrastructure remains exposed to timing attacks, bit-flip faults, and power-based side channels. Today, research targets LLM-specific risks like model extraction, training data leakage, and unsafe generation -- overlooking the impact of traditional system vulnerabilities. This work investigates how traditional software and hardware vulnerabilities can complement LLM-specific algorithmic attacks to compromise the integrity of a compound AI pipeline. We demonstrate two novel attacks that combine system-level vulnerabilities with algorithmic weaknesses: (1) Exploiting a software code injection flaw along with a guardrail Rowhammer attack to inject an unaltered jailbreak prompt into an LLM, resulting in an AI safety violation, and (2) Manipulating a knowledge database to redirect an LLM agent to transmit sensitive user data to a malicious application, thus breaching confidentiality. These attacks highlight the need to address traditional vulnerabilities; we systematize the attack primitives and analyze their composition by grouping vulnerabilities by their objective and mapping them to distinct stages of an attack lifecycle. This approach enables a rigorous red-teaming exercise and lays the groundwork for future defense strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 18 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 58 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 17
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 785
- 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 651
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
- 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Modelscited by 489
- 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 469
- 2023Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexitycited by 431
- 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 365
- 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 275
- 2024PoisonedRAG: Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Modelscited by 267
- 2023Defending Against Alignment-Breaking Attacks via Robustly Aligned LLMcited by 192
5 more
- 2024Defending Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks via Semantic Smoothingcited by 74
- 2023SoK: Memorization in General-Purpose Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2024ConfusedPilot: Confused Deputy Risks in RAG-based LLMscited by 22
- 2019An Off-Chip Attack on Hardware Enclaves via the Memory Buscited by 6
- 2020New Security Challenges on Machine Learning Inference Engine: Chip Cloning and Model Reverse Engineeringcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Survey of Vulnerabilities in Large Language Models Revealed by Adversarial Attacks
- 2024Exploring Vulnerabilities and Protections in Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2025Breaking Agent Backbones: Evaluating the Security of Backbone LLMs in AI Agents
- 2025Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms
- 2025Red Teaming the Mind of the Machine: A Systematic Evaluation of Prompt Injection and Jailbreak Vulnerabilities in LLMs
- 2025From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows
- 2026Compositional Jailbreaking: An Empirical Analysis of Mutator Chain Interactions in Aligned LLMs
- 2025Automated Vulnerability Validation and Verification: A Large Language Model Approach