Uncovering Locally Low-dimensional Structure in Networks by Locally Optimal Spectral Embedding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Standard Adjacency Spectral Embedding (ASE) relies on a global low-rank assumption often incompatible with the sparse, transitive structure of real-world networks, causing local geometric features to be 'smeared'. To address this, we introduce Local Adjacency Spectral Embedding (LASE), which uncovers locally low-dimensional structure via weighted spectral decomposition. Under a latent position model with a kernel feature map, we treat the image of latent positions as a locally low-dimensional set in infinite-dimensional feature space. We establish finite-sample bounds quantifying the trade-off between the statistical cost of localisation and the reduced truncation error achieved by targeting a locally low-dimensional region of the embedding. Furthermore, we prove that sufficient localisation induces rapid spectral decay and the emergence of a distinct spectral gap, theoretically justifying low-dimensional local embeddings. Experiments on synthetic and real networks show that LASE improves local reconstruction and visualisation over global and subgraph baselines, and we introduce UMAP-LASE for assembling overlapping local embeddings into high-fidelity global visualisations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.
Builds on
28 of 69 references.
References · 28
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
- 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
- 2013Consistency of spectral clustering in stochastic block modelscited by 128
- 2023Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 70
- 2017A statistical interpretation of spectral embedding: the generalised random dot product graphcited by 55
- 2013Regularized Spectral Clustering under the Degree-Corrected Stochastic Blockmodelcited by 45
- 2019Optimality of Spectral Clustering in the Gaussian Mixture Modelcited by 42
- 2020The impossibility of low rank representations for triangle-rich complex networkscited by 32
- 2022Statistical exploration of the Manifold Hypothesiscited by 29
- 2013Perfect Clustering for Stochastic Blockmodel Graphs via Adjacency Spectral Embeddingcited by 23
16 more
- 2020Manifold structure in graph embeddingscited by 17
- 2013Spectral Clustering Based on Local PCAcited by 15
- 2024A Short Survey on Importance Weighting for Machine Learningcited by 15
- 2021On the Power of Edge Independent Graph Modelscited by 13
- 2018Network Representation Using Graph Root Distributionscited by 12
- 2014Graph analysis of functional brain networks: practical issues in translational neurosciencecited by 10
- 2017Asymptotically efficient estimators for stochastic blockmodels: the naive MLE, the rank-constrained MLE, and the spectralcited by 9
- 2020Spectral clustering on spherical coordinates under the degree-corrected stochastic blockmodelcited by 9
- 2021Matrix factorisation and the interpretation of geodesic distancecited by 6
- 2021Popularity Adjusted Block Models are Generalized Random Dot Product Graphscited by 4
- 2017Consistency of adjacency spectral embedding for the mixed membership stochastic blockmodelcited by 2
- 2018Weighted Spectral Embedding of Graphscited by 2
- 2022Local2Global: A distributed approach for scaling representation learning on graphscited by 2
- 2020Fine-Grained Network Analysis for Modern Software Ecosystemscited by 1
- 2022Implications of sparsity and high triangle density for graph representation learningcited by 1
- 2023T-Stochastic Graphscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.