Exhaustive Circuit Mapping of a Single-Cell Foundation Model Reveals Massive Redundancy, Heavy-Tailed Hub Architecture, and Layer-Dependent Differentiation Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mechanistic interpretability of biological foundation models has relied on selective feature sampling, pairwise interaction testing, and observational trajectory analysis. Each of these can introduce systematic bias. Here we present three experiments that address these limitations through exhaustive circuit tracing, higher order combinatorial ablation, and causal trajectory steering in Geneformer, a transformer based single cell foundation model. First, exhaustive tracing of all 4065 active sparse autoencoder features at layer 5 yields 1393850 significant downstream edges, a 27 fold expansion over selective sampling. This reveals a heavy tailed hub distribution in which 1.8 percent of features account for disproportionate connectivity and 40 percent of the top 20 hubs lack biological annotation. These results indicate systematic annotation bias in prior selective analyses. Second, three way combinatorial ablation across 8 feature triplets shows that redundancy deepens monotonically with interaction order, with a three way ratio of 0.59 versus a pairwise ratio of 0.74, and with zero synergy. This confirms that the model architecture is subadditive at all tested orders. Third, trajectory guided feature steering establishes a causal link between layer position and differentiation directionality. Late layer features at L17 consistently push cell states toward maturity, with fraction positive equal to 1.0. Early and mid layer features at L0 and L11 mostly push away from maturity, with fraction positive ranging from 0.00 to 0.58. Together these results move from correlation toward causal evidence for layer dependent control of cell state.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.
Builds on
20 of 62 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 700
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
8 more
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
- 2024Sparse Feature Circuits: Discovering and Editing Interpretable Causal Graphs in Language Modelscited by 412
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
- 2023How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelcited by 199
- 2020Causal Mediation Analysis for Interpreting Neural NLP: The Case of Gender Biascited by 183
- 2026Systematic Evaluation of Single-Cell Foundation Model Interpretability Reveals Attention Captures Co-Expression Rather Than Unique Regulatory Signalcited by 7
- 2026Sparse autoencoders reveal organized biological knowledge but minimal regulatory logic in single-cell foundation models: a comparative atlas of Geneformer and scGPTcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.