Sparse autoencoders reveal organized biological knowledge but minimal regulatory logic in single-cell foundation models: a comparative atlas of Geneformer and scGPT
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Interpreting biomedical and science models
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Single-cell foundation models such as Geneformer and scGPT encode rich biological information, but whether this includes causal regulatory logic rather than statistical co-expression remains unclear. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) can resolve superposition in neural networks by decomposing dense activations into interpretable features, yet they have not been systematically applied to biological foundation models. Results: We trained TopK SAEs on residual stream activations from all layers of Geneformer V2-316M (18 layers, d=1152) and scGPT whole-human (12 layers, d=512), producing atlases of 82525 and 24527 features, respectively. Both atlases confirm massive superposition, with 99.8 percent of features invisible to SVD. Systematic characterization reveals rich biological organization: 29 to 59 percent of features annotate to Gene Ontology, KEGG, Reactome, STRING, or TRRUST, with U-shaped layer profiles reflecting hierarchical abstraction. Features organize into co-activation modules (141 in Geneformer, 76 in scGPT), exhibit causal specificity (median 2.36x), and form cross-layer information highways (63 to 99.8 percent). When tested against genome-scale CRISPRi perturbation data, only 3 of 48 transcription factors (6.2 percent) show regulatory-target-specific feature responses. A multi-tissue control yields marginal improvement (10.4 percent, 5 of 48 TFs), establishing model representations as the bottleneck. Conclusions: These models have internalized organized biological knowledge, including pathway membership, protein interactions, functional modules, and hierarchical abstraction, yet they encode minimal causal regulatory logic. We release both feature atlases as interactive web platforms enabling exploration of more than 107000 features across 30 layers of two leading single-cell foundation models.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpreting biomedical and science models, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 7 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.
Builds on
7 of 23 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 6
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2018From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communitiescited by 385
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Prototype Guided Post-pretraining for Single-Cell Representation Learningcited by 3
- 2026Exhaustive Circuit Mapping of a Single-Cell Foundation Model Reveals Massive Redundancy, Heavy-Tailed Hub Architecture, and Layer-Dependent Differentiation Controlcited by 1
- 2026Discovery of a Hematopoietic Manifold in scGPT Yields a Method for Extracting Performant Algorithms from Biological Foundation Model Internalscited by 0
- 2026CADENCE: A Cardiac Atom Dictionary for Interpretable Neural Concept Extraction from ECG Foundation Modelscited by 0
- 2026CADENCE: A Cardiac Atom Dictionary for Interpretable Neural Concept Extraction from ECG Foundation Models28 Jul 2026
- 2026Prototype Guided Post-pretraining for Single-Cell Representation Learning8 May 2026
- 2026Exhaustive Circuit Mapping of a Single-Cell Foundation Model Reveals Massive Redundancy, Heavy-Tailed Hub Architecture, and Layer-Dependent Differentiation Control12 Mar 2026
- 2026Discovery of a Hematopoietic Manifold in scGPT Yields a Method for Extracting Performant Algorithms from Biological Foundation Model Internals10 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Can sparse autoencoders make sense of gene expression latent variable models?
- 2026Causal Circuit Tracing Reveals Distinct Computational Architectures in Single-Cell Foundation Models: Inhibitory Dominance, Biological Coherence, and Cross-Model Convergence
- 2025SAE-RNA: A Sparse Autoencoder Model for Interpreting RNA Language Model Representations
- 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025ProtSAE: Disentangling and Interpreting Protein Language Models via Semantically-Guided Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026Resolving superposition in AI for interpretability and cross-modal alignment in patient-neuronal images
- 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Features