CFD-HAR: User-controllable Privacy through Conditional Feature Disentanglement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern wearable and mobile devices are equipped with inertial measurement units (IMUs). Human Activity Recognition (HAR) applications running on such devices use machine-learning-based, data-driven techniques that leverage such sensor data. However, sensor-data-driven HAR deployments face two critical challenges: protecting sensitive user information embedded in sensor data in accordance with users' privacy preferences and maintaining high recognition performance with limited labeled samples. This paper proposes a technique for user-controllable privacy through feature disentanglement-based representation learning at the granular level for dynamic privacy filtering. We also compare the efficacy of our technique against few-shot HAR using autoencoder-based representation learning. We analyze their architectural designs, learning objectives, privacy guarantees, data efficiency, and suitability for edge Internet of Things (IoT) deployment. Our study shows that CFD-based HAR provides explicit, tunable privacy protection controls by separating activity and sensitive attributes in the latent space, whereas autoencoder-based few-shot HAR offers superior label efficiency and lightweight adaptability but lacks inherent privacy safeguards. We further examine the security implications of both approaches in continual IoT settings, highlighting differences in susceptibility to representation leakage and embedding-level attacks. The analysis reveals that neither paradigm alone fully satisfies the emerging requirements of next-generation IoT HAR systems. We conclude by outlining research directions toward unified frameworks that jointly optimize privacy preservation, few-shot adaptability, and robustness for trustworthy IoT intelligence.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 44 references.
References · 18
- 2016InfoGAN: Interpretable Representation Learning by Information Maximizing Generative Adversarial Netscited by 858
- 2019A Survey of Autonomous Driving: Common Practices and Emerging Technologiescited by 373
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
- 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
- 2017Deep Learning for Sensor-based Activity Recognition: A Surveycited by 133
- 2018Mobile Sensor Data Anonymizationcited by 70
- 2021Log-based Anomaly Detection Without Log Parsingcited by 59
- 2021Federated Intrusion Detection for IoT with Heterogeneous Cohort Privacycited by 14
- 2019Few-Shot Learning-Based Human Activity Recognitioncited by 11
- 2024A Comprehensive Review of Few-shot Action Recognitioncited by 11
- 2019Privacy and Utility Preserving Sensor-Data Transformationscited by 9
- 2022Learning Disentangled Behaviour Patterns for Wearable-based Human Activity Recognitioncited by 9
6 more
- 2025PCAP-Backdoor: Backdoor Poisoning Generator for Network Traffic in CPS/IoT Environmentscited by 9
- 2025Dynamic User-controllable Privacy-preserving Few-shot Sensing Frameworkcited by 8
- 2025Dynamic Black-box Backdoor Attacks on IoT Sensory Datacited by 8
- 2025Log Anomaly Detection with Large Language Models via Knowledge-Enriched Fusioncited by 8
- 2017Replacement AutoEncoder: A Privacy-Preserving Algorithm for Sensory Data Analysiscited by 6
- 2026Contrastive Continual Learning for Model Adaptability in Internet of Thingscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.