mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Explainable AI Attribution Methods in Neural Machine Translation via Attention-Guided Knowledge Distillation

arXiv 2603.11342 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The study of the attribution of input features to the output of neural network models is an active area of research. While numerous Explainable AI (XAI) techniques have been proposed to interpret these models, the systematic and automated evaluation of these methods in sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) models is less explored. This paper introduces a new approach for evaluating explainability methods in transformer-based seq2seq models. We use teacher-derived attribution maps as a structured side signal to guide a student model, and quantify the utility of different attribution methods through the student's ability to simulate targets. Using the Inseq library, we extract attribution scores over source-target sequence pairs and inject these scores into the attention mechanism of a student transformer model under four composition operators (addition, multiplication, averaging, and replacement). Across three language pairs (de-en, fr-en, ar-en) and attributions from Marian-MT and mBART models, Attention, Value Zeroing, and Layer Gradient × Activation consistently yield the largest gains in BLEU (and corresponding improvements in chrF) relative to baselines. In contrast, other gradient-based methods (Saliency, Integrated Gradients, DeepLIFT, Input × Gradient, GradientShap) lead to smaller and less consistent improvements. These results suggest that different attribution methods capture distinct signals and that attention-derived attributions better capture alignment between source and target representations in seq2seq models. Finally, we introduce an Attributor transformer that, given a source-target pair, learns to reconstruct the teacher's attribution map. Our findings demonstrate that the more accurately the Attributor can reproduce attribution maps, the more useful an injection of those maps is for the downstream task. The source code can be found on GitHub.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2026.

Builds on

55 of 81 references.

References · 55

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  6. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  7. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  8. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  10. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  11. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  12. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
38 more
  1. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
  2. 2019TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1,153
  3. 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
  4. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  5. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  6. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  7. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 467
  8. 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 299
  9. 2020Multilingual Translation with Extensible Multilingual Pretraining and Finetuningcited by 287
  10. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 225
  11. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  12. 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
  13. 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 158
  14. 2017The Shattered Gradients Problem: If resnets are the answer, then what is the question?cited by 156
  15. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 155
  16. 2018Explaining Image Classifiers by Counterfactual Generationcited by 144
  17. 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
  18. 2019Neural Machine Translation: A Review and Surveycited by 99
  19. 2020Evaluating Explanations: How much do explanations from the teacher aid students?cited by 94
  20. 2023A Survey of GPT-3 Family Large Language Models Including ChatGPT and GPT-4cited by 81
  21. 2023Inseq: An Interpretability Toolkit for Sequence Generation Modelscited by 78
  22. 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
  23. 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  24. 2014Extraction of Salient Sentences from Labelled Documentscited by 50
  25. 2022Towards Opening the Black Box of Neural Machine Translation: Source and Target Interpretations of the Transformercited by 45
  26. 2023Quantifying Context Mixing in Transformerscited by 43
  27. 2016Explaining Predictions of Non-Linear Classifiers in NLPcited by 37
  28. 2021Is Sparse Attention more Interpretable?cited by 31
  29. 2021Evaluating the Faithfulness of Importance Measures in NLP by Recursively Masking Allegedly Important Tokens and Retrainingcited by 31
  30. 2017What does Attention in Neural Machine Translation Pay Attention to?cited by 30
  31. 2019Adding Interpretable Attention to Neural Translation Models Improves Word Alignmentcited by 30
  32. 2019Saliency-driven Word Alignment Interpretation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 27
  33. 2019Enhancing Machine Translation with Dependency-Aware Self-Attentioncited by 24
  34. 2021Translation Error Detection as Rationale Extractioncited by 22
  35. 2023Rationalization for Explainable NLP: A Surveycited by 22
  36. 2023DecoderLens: Layerwise Interpretation of Encoder-Decoder Transformerscited by 22
  37. 2019Towards Understanding Neural Machine Translation with Word Importancecited by 19
  38. 2024Abstractive Text Summarization: State of the Art, Challenges, and Improvementscited by 17

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.