COMPASS: The explainable agentic framework for Sovereignty, Sustainability, Compliance, and Ethics
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid proliferation of large language model (LLM)-based agentic systems raises critical concerns regarding digital sovereignty, environmental sustainability, regulatory compliance, and ethical alignment. Whilst existing frameworks address individual dimensions in isolation, no unified architecture systematically integrates these imperatives into the decision-making processes of autonomous agents. This paper introduces the COMPASS (Compliance and Orchestration for Multi-dimensional Principles in Autonomous Systems with Sovereignty) Framework, a novel multi-agent orchestration system designed to enforce value-aligned AI through modular, extensible governance mechanisms. The framework comprises an Orchestrator and four specialised sub-agents addressing sovereignty, carbon-aware computing, compliance, and ethics, each augmented with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to ground evaluations in verified, context-specific documents. By employing an LLM-as-a-judge methodology, the system assigns quantitative scores and generates explainable justifications for each assessment dimension, enabling real-time arbitration of conflicting objectives. We validate the architecture through automated evaluation, demonstrating that RAG integration significantly enhances semantic coherence and mitigates the hallucination risks. Our results indicate that the framework's composition-based design facilitates seamless integration into diverse application domains whilst preserving interpretability and traceability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2026.
Builds on
9 of 33 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey5 Feb
- 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents5 Sep
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug
Other references · 6
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2022Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AIcited by 58
- 2025Large Language Models for Code Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Challenges, Techniques, Evaluation, and Applicationscited by 26
- 2025From Prompts to Power: Measuring the Energy Footprint of LLM Inferencecited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Sovereign Agents: Towards Infrastructural Sovereignty and Diffused Accountability in Decentralized AI
- 2026Computational Reflective Equilibrium for Agentic AI: A Rawlsian Alignment Scaffold for Governance
- 2025Characterizing AI Agents for Alignment and Governance
- 2025AGENTSAFE: A Unified Framework for Ethical Assurance and Governance in Agentic AI
- 2026Architecting Agentic Communities using Design Patterns
- 2025Governance-as-a-Service: A Multi-Agent Framework for AI System Compliance and Policy Enforcement
- 2025Multi-level Value Alignment in Agentic AI Systems: Survey and Perspectives
- 2025Black Box Deployed -- Functional Criteria for Artificial Moral Agents in the LLM Era