mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Interleaving: Causal Attention Reformulations for Generative Recommender Systems

arXiv 2603.10369 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2026cs.IR cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative Recommender Systems (GR) increasingly model user behavior as a sequence generation task by interleaving item and action tokens. While effective, this formulation introduces significant structural and computational inefficiencies: it doubles sequence length, incurs quadratic overhead, and relies on implicit attention to recover the causal relationship between an item and its associated action. Furthermore, interleaving heterogeneous tokens forces the Transformer to disentangle semantically incompatible signals, leading to increased attention noise and reduced representation efficiency.In this work, we propose a principled reformulation of generative recommendation that aligns sequence modeling with underlying causal structures and attention theory. We demonstrate that current interleaving mechanisms act as inefficient proxies for similarity-weighted action pooling. To address this, we introduce two novel architectures that eliminate interleaved dependencies to reduce sequence complexity by 50%: Attention-based Late Fusion for Actions (AttnLFA) and Attention-based Mixed Value Pooling (AttnMVP). These models explicitly encode the in rightarrow an causal dependency while preserving the expressive power of Transformer-based sequence modeling.We evaluate our framework on large-scale product recommendation data from a major social network. Experimental results show that AttnLFA and AttnMVP consistently outperform interleaved baselines, achieving evaluation loss improvements of 0.29% and 0.80%, and significant gains in Normalized Entropy (NE). Crucially, these performance gains are accompanied by training time reductions of 23% and 12%, respectively. Our findings suggest that explicitly modeling item-action causality provides a superior design paradigm for scalable and efficient generative ranking.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2026.

Builds on

15 of 21 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  4. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  5. 2018Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendationcited by 1,184
  6. 2019BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformercited by 964
  7. 2016Wide & Deep Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 747
  8. 2022Recommendation as Language Processing (RLP): A Unified Pretrain, Personalized Prompt & Predict Paradigm (P5)cited by 402
  9. 2019Deep Learning Recommendation Model for Personalization and Recommendation Systemscited by 327
  10. 2020DCN V2: Improved Deep & Cross Network and Practical Lessons for Web-scale Learning to Rank Systemscited by 327
  11. 2025OneRec: Unifying Retrieve and Rank with Generative Recommender and Iterative Preference Alignmentcited by 173
  12. 2025MTGR: Industrial-Scale Generative Recommendation Framework in Meituancited by 49
3 more
  1. 2021End-to-End User Behavior Retrieval in Click-Through RatePrediction Modelcited by 45
  2. 2025TBGRecall: A Generative Retrieval Model for E-commerce Recommendation Scenarioscited by 5
  3. 2025The Layout Is the Model: On Action-Item Coupling in Generative Recommendationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.