Why Does It Look There? Structured Explanations for Image Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models achieve remarkable predictive performance, yet their black-box nature limits transparency and trustworthiness. Although numerous explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods have been proposed, they primarily provide saliency maps or concepts (i.e., unstructured interpretability). Existing approaches often rely on auxiliary models (eg, GPT, CLIP) to describe model behavior, thereby compromising faithfulness to the original models. We propose Interpretability to Explainability (I2X), a framework that builds structured explanations directly from unstructured interpretability by quantifying progress at selected checkpoints during training using prototypes extracted from post-hoc XAI methods (e.g., GradCAM). I2X answers the question of "why does it look there" by providing a structured view of both intra- and inter-class decision making during training. Experiments on MNIST and CIFAR10 demonstrate effectiveness of I2X to reveal prototype-based inference process of various image classification models. Moreover, we demonstrate that I2X can be used to improve predictions across different model architectures and datasets: we can identify uncertain prototypes recognized by I2X and then use targeted perturbation of samples that allows fine-tuning to ultimately improve accuracy. Thus, I2X not only faithfully explains model behavior but also provides a practical approach to guide optimization toward desired targets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.
Builds on
25 of 39 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
13 more
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 313
- 2024AttnLRP: Attention-Aware Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Transformerscited by 120
- 2022Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributionscited by 115
- 2025Weight-sparse transformers have interpretable circuitscited by 44
- 2026From Entropy to Epiplexity: Rethinking Information for Computationally Bounded Intelligencecited by 41
- 2024Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data Influencecited by 35
- 2024Token Transformation Matters: Towards Faithful Post-hoc Explanation for Vision Transformercited by 19
- 2025Quantifying Cross-Attention Interaction in Transformers for Interpreting TCR-pMHC Bindingcited by 4
- 2025Rational Multi-Modal Transformers for TCR-pMHC Predictioncited by 4
- 2025iMIND: Insightful Multi-subject Invariant Neural Decodingcited by 3
- 2025TCR-EML: Explainable Model Layers for TCR-pMHC Predictioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.