Context Engineering: From Prompts to Corporate Multi-Agent Architecture
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems evolve from stateless chatbots to autonomous multi-step agents, prompt engineering (PE), the discipline of crafting individual queries, proves necessary but insufficient. This paper introduces context engineering (CE) as a standalone discipline concerned with designing, structuring, and managing the entire informational environment in which an AI agent makes decisions. Drawing on vendor architectures (Google ADK, Anthropic, LangChain), current academic work (ACE framework, Google DeepMind's intelligent delegation), enterprise research (Deloitte, 2026; KPMG, 2026), and the author's experience building a multi-agent system, the paper proposes five context quality criteria: relevance, sufficiency, isolation, economy, and provenance, and frames context as the agent's operating system. Two higher-order disciplines follow. Intent engineering (IE) encodes organizational goals, values, and trade-off hierarchies into agent infrastructure. Specification engineering (SE) creates a machine-readable corpus of corporate policies and standards enabling autonomous operation of multi-agent systems at scale. Together these four disciplines form a cumulative pyramid maturity model of agent engineering, in which each level subsumes the previous one as a necessary foundation. Enterprise data reveals a gap: while 75% of enterprises plan agentic AI deployment within two years (Deloitte, 2026), deployment has surged and retreated as organizations confront scaling complexity (KPMG, 2026). The Klarna case illustrates a dual deficit, contextual and intentional. Whoever controls the agent's context controls its behavior; whoever controls its intent controls its strategy; whoever controls its specifications controls its scale.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.
Builds on
1 of 16 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Designcited by 12
- 2026Engineering Reliable Coding Agents: Evaluating and Operating the System Around the Modelcited by 3
- 2026Context Kubernetes: Declarative Orchestration of Enterprise Knowledge for Agentic AI Systemscited by 1
- 2026Augment Engineering: A Methodology for Multi-Tool AI Orchestration Across Professional Domainscited by 0
- 2026Engineering Reliable Coding Agents: Evaluating and Operating the System Around the Model14 Aug 2026
- 2026From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Design14 Jun 2026
- 2026Augment Engineering: A Methodology for Multi-Tool AI Orchestration Across Professional Domains22 May 2026
- 2026Context Kubernetes: Declarative Orchestration of Enterprise Knowledge for Agentic AI Systems13 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Context Engineering for AI Agents in Open-Source Software
- 2026A Tutorial on Prompt Engineering: From Messy Thoughts to AI Workflows
- 2025Advancing Multi-Agent Systems Through Model Context Protocol: Architecture, Implementation, and Applications
- 2026AI Agents Do Not Fail Alone:The Context Fails First
- 2025Everything is Context: Agentic File System Abstraction for Context Engineering
- 2025Context Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Code Assistants Using Elicit, NotebookLM, ChatGPT, and Claude Code
- 2024A Survey on Context-Aware Multi-Agent Systems: Techniques, Challenges and Future Directions
- 2025A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models