Telogenesis: Goal Is All U Need
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Goal-conditioned systems assume goals are provided externally. We ask whether attentional priorities can emerge endogenously from an agent's internal cognitive state. We propose a priority function that generates observation targets from three epistemic gaps: ignorance (posterior variance), surprise (prediction error), and staleness (temporal decay of confidence in unobserved variables). We validate this in two systems: a minimal attention-allocation environment (2,000 runs) and a modular, partially observable world (500 runs). Ablation shows each component is necessary. A key finding is metric-dependent reversal: under global prediction error, coverage-based rotation wins; under change detection latency, priority-guided allocation wins, with advantage growing monotonically with dimensionality (d = -0.95 at N=48, p < 10^-6). Detection latency follows a power law in attention budget, with a steeper exponent for priority-guided allocation (0.55 vs. 0.40). When the decay rate is made learnable per variable, the system spontaneously recovers environmental volatility structure without supervision (t = 22.5, p < 10^-6). We demonstrate that epistemic gaps alone, without external reward, suffice to generate adaptive priorities that outperform fixed strategies and recover latent environmental structure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.
Builds on
3 of 12 references.
References · 3
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,136
- 2018Exploration by Random Network Distillationcited by 993
Built on by
Not cited yet.