Differentiable Stochastic Traffic Dynamics: Physics-Informed Generative Modelling in Transportation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Macroscopic traffic flow is stochastic, but the physics-informed deep learning methods currently used in transportation literature embed deterministic PDEs and produce point-valued outputs; the stochasticity of the governing dynamics plays no role in the learned representation. This work develops a framework in which the physics constraint itself is distributional and directly derived from stochastic traffic-flow dynamics. Starting from an Ito-type Lighthill-Whitham-Richards model with Brownian forcing, we derive a one-point forward equation for the marginal traffic density at each spatial location. The spatial coupling induced by the conservation law appears as an explicit conditional drift term, which makes the closure requirement transparent. Based on this formulation, we derive an equivalent deterministic Probability Flow ODE that is pointwise evaluable and differentiable once a closure is specified. Incorporating this as a physics constraint, we then propose a score network with an advection-closure module, trainable by denoising score matching together with a Fokker-Planck residual loss. The resulting model targets a data-conditioned density distribution, from which point estimates, credible intervals, and congestion-risk measures can be computed. The framework provides a basis for distributional traffic-state estimation and for stochastic fundamental-diagram analysis in a physics-informed generative setting.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2026.
Builds on
16 of 60 references.
References · 16
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
- 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
- 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 897
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
- 2021Diffusion Schr"odinger Bridge with Applications to Score-Based Generative Modelingcited by 594
- 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 584
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 470
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
4 more
- 2018Quantifying total uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse stochastic problemscited by 144
- 2017Learning Traffic as Images: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Large-Scale Transportation Network Speed Predictioncited by 67
- 2020A Physics-Informed Deep Learning Paradigm for Car-Following Modelscited by 40
- 2018Multi-Output Gaussian Processes for Crowdsourced Traffic Data Imputationcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.