mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Boiling Frog Threshold: Criticality and Blindness in World Model-Based Anomaly Detection Under Gradual Drift

arXiv 2603.08455 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: World models → Latent dynamics models and model-based RL

Abstract (arXiv)

When an RL agent's observations are gradually corrupted, at what drift rate does it "wake up" -- and what determines this boundary? We study world model-based self-monitoring under continuous observation drift across four MuJoCo environments, three detector families (z-score, variance, percentile), and three model capacities. We find that (1) a sharp detection threshold varepsilon^* exists universally: below it, drift is absorbed as normal variation; above it, detection occurs rapidly. The threshold's existence and sigmoid shape are invariant across all detector families and model capacities, though its position depends on the interaction between detector sensitivity, noise floor structure, and environment dynamics. (2) Sinusoidal drift is completely undetectable by all detector families -- including variance and percentile detectors with no temporal smoothing -- establishing this as a world model property rather than a detector artifact. (3) Within each environment, varepsilon^* follows a power law in detector parameters (R2 = 0.89-0.97), but cross-environment prediction fails (R2 = 0.45), revealing that the missing variable is environment-specific dynamics structure partial PE/partialvarepsilon. (4) In fragile environments, agents collapse before any detector can fire ("collapse before awareness"), creating a fundamentally unmonitorable failure mode. Our results reframe varepsilon^* from an emergent world model property to a three-way interaction between noise floor, detector, and environment dynamics, providing a more defensible and empirically grounded account of self-monitoring boundaries in RL agents.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Latent dynamics models and model-based RL, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2026.

Builds on

7 of 16 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025World Models for Anomaly Detection during Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Inference4 Mar
  2. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Models10 Jan
  3. 2018World Models27 Mar

Other references · 4

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  3. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
  4. 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 470

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Certified World Models as Sensing Clocks: Drift-Aware Deadlines for Active Perception
  2. 2026World Models Under Asynchronous Sensor Observations
  3. 2025World Model Robustness via Surprise Recognition
  4. 2023Exploring the Potential of World Models for Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Driving
  5. 2026Why LLM Agents Collapse Without Oversight: The Enforcement Gap as the Mechanism Behind Emergence World Failures
  6. 2026An Omitted Mode Is a Rare Rule: The Sampling-Verification Danger Law in Continuous Code World Models
  7. 2026Reading the Room: Implicit Confusion Encoding in Recurrent World Model States
  8. 2026TraceBench: Controlled Evaluation of LLM Agents for Time-Series Root-Cause Attribution