mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

OrdinalBench: A Benchmark Dataset for Diagnosing Generalization Limits in Ordinal Number Understanding of Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2603.07786 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have advanced across multimodal benchmarks but still show clear gaps in ordinal number understanding, i.e., the ability to track relative positions and generalize to large indices. We present OrdinalBench, a diagnostic benchmark that standardizes ordinal number understanding as an evaluation task for VLMs. The core task is N-th object identification, defined by a starting reference and traversal rule. Task difficulty is controlled along three axes: (i) ordinal magnitude, from small numbers to extreme cases up to 300; (ii) arrangement complexity, from single loops to maze-like paths; and (iii) object count. The benchmark provides 39,000 question-answer pairs, each annotated with a ground-truth reasoning trajectory and balanced across difficulty levels for controlled large-scale testing. Beyond answer-only evaluation, our framework requires models to generate structured stepwise traces of the counting process and provides an open evaluation toolkit that measures both final accuracy and step-level path consistency. Zero-shot evaluations of GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, Qwen2.5-VL, InternVL3.5, and Molmo reveal sharp degradation under large-ordinal and complex-path conditions, highlighting weak generalization despite strong scores on standard multimodal tasks. By framing ordinal number understanding as a core target, OrdinalBench provides a reproducible benchmark and diagnostic framework for developing VLMs with stronger sequential reasoning. All data and code are available at https://ordinalbench.github.io/

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 11 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.

Builds on

11 of 18 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Molmo and PixMo: Open Weights and Open Data for State-of-the-Art Vision-Language Models25 Sep

Other references · 10

  1. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  2. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  3. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  4. 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,419
  5. 2018TallyQA: Answering Complex Counting Questionscited by 152
  6. 2019CLEVR-Ref+: Diagnosing Visual Reasoning with Referring Expressionscited by 73
  7. 2024Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference Under Ambiguitiescited by 58
  8. 2025CAPTURe: Evaluating Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Occluded Object Countingcited by 36
  9. 2024Teach CLIP to Develop a Number Sense for Ordinal Regressioncited by 20
  10. 2024Quantifying Generalization Complexity for Large Language Modelscited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024UniBench: Visual Reasoning Requires Rethinking Vision-Language Beyond Scaling
  2. 2023Large Language Models as Automated Aligners for benchmarking Vision-Language Models
  3. 2023Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding
  4. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?
  5. 2026Counting Circuits: Mechanistic Interpretability of Visual Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models
  6. 2023IdealGPT: Iteratively Decomposing Vision and Language Reasoning via Large Language Models
  7. 2026Counting to Four is still a Chore for VLMs
  8. 2022VLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Evaluating Vision-Language Models