mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Trusting What You Cannot See: Auditable Fine-Tuning and Inference for Proprietary AI

arXiv 2603.07466 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2026cs.CR cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cloud-based infrastructure has become the dominant platform for deploying large models, particularly large language models (LLMs). Fine-tuning and inference are increasingly delegated to cloud providers for simplified deployment and access to proprietary models, yet this creates a fundamental trust gap. Although cryptographic and TEE-based verification approaches exist, prohibitive proving costs and limited TEE memory prevent them from scaling to modern LLMs, leaving clients unable to practically audit these processes. This lack of transparency creates concrete security risks that can silently compromise service integrity. We present AFTUNE, an auditable and verifiable framework that ensures the computational integrity of cloud-based fine-tuning and inference. AFTUNE incorporates a lightweight recording and spot-check mechanism that produces verifiable traces of execution. These traces enable clients to later audit whether the fine-tuning and inference processes followed the agreed configurations, by verifying sampled execution blocks inside a TEE, each covering only a small portion of the model and the execution trace. Our evaluation shows that AFTUNE adds modest overhead and makes auditing practical for clients.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2026.

Builds on

22 of 55 references.

References · 22

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  5. 2020Visual Transformers: Token-based Image Representation and Processing for Computer Visioncited by 334
  6. 2024BadEdit: Backdooring large language models by model editingcited by 96
  7. 2021PPFL: Privacy-preserving Federated Learning with Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 93
  8. 2024Red-Teaming for Generative AI: Silver Bullet or Security Theater?cited by 83
  9. 2024Against The Achilles' Heel: A Survey on Red Teaming for Generative Modelscited by 59
  10. 2024zkLLM: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Large Language Modelscited by 51
  11. 2024BackdoorLLM: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Backdoor Attacks and Defenses on Large Language Modelscited by 50
  12. 2025MentalChat16K: A Benchmark Dataset for Conversational Mental Health Assistancecited by 39
10 more
  1. 2023A Survey on Deep Learning Hardware Accelerators for Heterogeneous HPC Platformscited by 21
  2. 2024A Survey on Hardware Accelerators for Large Language Modelscited by 16
  3. 2021secureTF: A Secure TensorFlow Frameworkcited by 12
  4. 2024PipeLLM: Fast and Confidential Large Language Model Services with Speculative Pipelined Encryptioncited by 10
  5. 2024Concept-ROT: Poisoning Concepts in Large Language Models with Model Editingcited by 8
  6. 2023A Comprehensive Performance Study of Large Language Models on Novel AI Acceleratorscited by 7
  7. 2025Persistent Backdoor Attacks under Continual Fine-Tuning of LLMscited by 7
  8. 2024vTune: Verifiable Fine-Tuning for LLMs Through Backdooringcited by 4
  9. 2025Characterization of GPU TEE Overheads in Distributed Data Parallel ML Trainingcited by 2
  10. 2025H2:Towards Efficient Large-Scale LLM Training on Hyper-Heterogeneous Cluster over 1,000 Chipscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.