mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PresentBench: A Fine-Grained Rubric-Based Benchmark for Slide Generation

arXiv 2603.07244 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Slides serve as a critical medium for conveying information in presentation-oriented scenarios such as academia, education, and business. Despite their importance, creating high-quality slide decks remains time-consuming and cognitively demanding. Recent advances in generative models, such as Nano Banana Pro, have made automated slide generation increasingly feasible. However, existing evaluations of slide generation are often coarse-grained and rely on holistic judgments, making it difficult to accurately assess model capabilities or track meaningful advances in the field. In practice, the lack of fine-grained, verifiable evaluation criteria poses a critical bottleneck for both research and real-world deployment. In this paper, we propose PresentBench, a fine-grained, rubric-based benchmark for evaluating automated real-world slide generation. It contains 238 evaluation instances, each supplemented with background materials required for slide creation. Moreover, we manually design an average of 54.1 checklist items per instance, each formulated as a binary question, to enable fine-grained, instance-specific evaluation of the generated slide decks. Extensive experiments show that PresentBench provides more reliable evaluation results than existing methods, and exhibits significantly stronger alignment with human preferences. Furthermore, our benchmark reveals that NotebookLM significantly outperforms other slide generation methods, highlighting substantial recent progress in this domain.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2026.

Builds on

21 of 52 references.

References · 21

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  6. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  7. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,096
  8. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
  9. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
  10. 2024Prometheus 2: An Open Source Language Model Specialized in Evaluating Other Language Modelscited by 431
  11. 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmarkcited by 362
  12. 2023Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignmentcited by 163
9 more
  1. 2025PPTAgent: Generating and Evaluating Presentations Beyond Text-to-Slidescited by 83
  2. 2025OneIG-Bench: Omni-dimensional Nuanced Evaluation for Image Generationcited by 81
  3. 2025AutoPresent: Designing Structured Visuals from Scratchcited by 63
  4. 2025Bee: A High-Quality Corpus and Full-Stack Suite to Unlock Advanced Fully Open MLLMscited by 27
  5. 2025GenExam: A Multidisciplinary Text-to-Image Examcited by 19
  6. 2025MMMG: A Massive, Multidisciplinary, Multi-Tier Generation Benchmark for Text-to-Image Reasoningcited by 14
  7. 2025PPTBench: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Large Language Models for PowerPoint Layout and Design Understandingcited by 11
  8. 2025PPTArena: A Benchmark for PowerPoint Editingcited by 9
  9. 2026SlidesGen-Bench: Evaluating Slides Generation via Computational and Quantitative Metricscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 12.

12 papers.