mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Predicting Cellular Responses to Gene Perturbation

arXiv 2603.07233 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.IRcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Medical and biomedical RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Predicting transcriptional responses to genetic perturbations is fundamental to functional genomics and therapeutic discovery. Recent deep learning models have shown promise in single-cell perturbation response prediction, but they typically generate each response in isolation, without explicitly leveraging related perturbations. We introduce PT-RAG (Perturbation-aware Two-stage Retrieval-Augmented Generation), a plug-in retrieval-and-conditioning module for generative cellular perturbation response. PT-RAG augments an existing perturbation-response backbone with learned access to related perturbation contexts. The key challenge is that relevance is not fixed in this setting: functionally related genes may elicit different effects across cell types. PT-RAG addresses this with a two-stage retrieval mechanism: GenePT-based semantic retrieval first identifies K candidate perturbations, after which a differentiable Gumbel-Softmax selector adaptively selects retrieved contexts conditioned on the control cell state, the query perturbation, and each candidate perturbation. We evaluate PT-RAG on two backbones, a STATE-style generator used as a frozen random reservoir and a fully trained scGPT, across cross-cell-type and cross-perturbation generalization tasks. PT-RAG consistently improves distributional similarity and often overall predictive quality; for example, on scGPT cross-cell-type results, the 2-Wasserstein distance drops by 5.9% relative to scGPT alone. The code to reproduce our experiments is available at https://github.com/difra100/PT-RAG_NIPS.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and biomedical RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 8 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2026.

Builds on

8 of 35 references.

References · 8

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  4. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  5. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
  6. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,411
  7. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
  8. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Plausibility Is Not Prediction: Contrastive Evidence for LLM-Based Cellular Perturbation Reasoning
  2. 2026Unlocking Biological Workflows for Robust Protein-Text Question Answering: A Dual-Dimensional RAG Framework
  3. 2026PertReason: A Knowledge-Grounded Benchmark and Framework for Cell-State-Conditioned Mechanistic Reasoning of Perturbation Effects
  4. 2026PertMind: Eliciting Emergent Biological Reasoning in LLM via Reinforcement Learning on Cellular Perturbation Data
  5. 2026VCLMU: Mechanism-Centric Virtual Cell World Modeling for Perturbation Response
  6. 2025ModernBERT + ColBERT: Enhancing biomedical RAG through an advanced re-ranking retriever
  7. 2025Contextualizing biological perturbation experiments through language
  8. 2025SynthPert: Enhancing LLM Biological Reasoning via Synthetic Reasoning Traces for Cellular Perturbation Prediction