mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Breaking the Geometric Bottleneck: Contrastive Expansion in Asymmetric Cross-Modal Distillation

arXiv 2603.06698 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Knowledge distillation → General knowledge distillation methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge distillation between asymmetric architectures often induces severe geometric constraints on the learned representation space. We investigate dimensional collapse when distilling global Vision Transformers into capacity-constrained, local-receptive-field CNNs (0.5M-8.0M parameters). Using strictly centered SVD and Shannon Entropy Effective Rank, we confirm capacity-agnostic collapse under cosine distillation: a CLIP ViT-B/32 Teacher exhibits Effective Rank 88.68 on CIFAR-10, while all cosine-distilled students collapse to ~17 regardless of parameter count. An auxiliary InfoNCE objective expands this to ~41 dimensions. Critically, we ask whether this expansion is functionally useful. Multi-seed linear-probe evaluation shows InfoNCE expansion degrades downstream accuracy by 15-18 points relative to the collapsed baseline, despite more than doubling Effective Rank. A class-structure decomposition traces this to signal dilution: InfoNCE's class-blind uniformity pressure weakens class-discriminative structure in the original dimensions while adding only weakly relevant structure elsewhere. We then test a label-aware alternative, Supervised Contrastive distillation. On CIFAR-100, where we swept student capacity directly, its Effective Rank is invariant to capacity; on CIFAR-10, at a single tested width, it settles to a lower rank while matching baseline accuracy. Sweeping temperature instead of capacity, rank and downstream accuracy increase together monotonically. These results show Effective Rank alone is not a reliable proxy for representation quality: whether expansion helps or harms downstream performance depends on whether the driving objective is label-aware, not the magnitude of expansion itself.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General knowledge distillation methods, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 5 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

5 of 7 references.

References · 5

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  4. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
  5. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 378

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Distillation Dynamics: Towards Understanding Feature-Based Distillation in Vision Transformers
  2. 2024Preserving Angles Improves Feature Distillation
  3. 2025From Per-Image Low-Rank to Encoding Mismatch: Rethinking Feature Distillation in Vision Transformers
  4. 2026Geometric Limits of Knowledge Distillation: A Minimum-Width Theorem via Superposition Theory
  5. 2026Grid-Preserving Knowledge Distillation: Transferring Convolutional Inductive Bias to Vision Transformers under Data Scarcity
  6. 2025AME: Aligned Manifold Entropy for Robust Vision-Language Distillation
  7. 2026Gromov-Wasserstein Distillation for Inductive Multi-View Embedding
  8. 2026Distilling Vision Transformers for Distortion-Robust Representation Learning