mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometric Limits of Knowledge Distillation: A Minimum-Width Theorem via Superposition Theory

arXiv 2604.04037 ↗First posted 5 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge distillation compresses large teachers into smaller students, but performance saturates at a loss floor that persists across training methods and objectives. We argue this floor is geometric: neural networks represent far more features than dimensions through superposition, and a student of width dS can encode at most dS · g(α) features, where g(α) = 1/((1-α)lnfrac11-α) is a sparsity-dependent capacity function. Features beyond this budget are permanently lost, yielding an importance-weighted loss floor. We validate on a toy model (48 configurations, median accuracy >93%) and on Pythia-410M, where sparse autoencoders measure F ≈ 28,700 features at α ≈ 0.992 (critical width dS^* ≈ 1,065). Distillation into five student widths confirms the predicted monotonic floor ordering. The observed floor decomposes into a geometric component and a width-independent architectural baseline (R2 = 0.993). Linear probing shows coarse concepts survive even 88% feature loss, revealing the floor arises from aggregate loss of fine-grained features in the importance distribution's long tail. Our results connect representation geometry to distillation limits and provide a practical tool for predicting distillation performance from SAE measurements alone.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Apr 2026.

Builds on

8 of 16 references.

References · 8

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
  3. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
  4. 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
  5. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  6. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
  7. 2019Contrastive Representation Distillationcited by 734
  8. 2022Polysemanticity and Capacity in Neural Networkscited by 74

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.