mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ERP-RiskBench: Leakage-Safe Ensemble Learning for Financial Risk

arXiv 2603.06671 ↗First posted 3 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Financial risk detection in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems is an important but underexplored application of machine learning. Published studies in this area tend to suffer from vague dataset descriptions, leakage-prone pipelines, and evaluation practices that inflate reported performance. This paper presents a rebuilt experimental framework for ERP financial risk detection using ensemble machine learning. The risk definition is hybrid, covering both procurement compliance anomalies and transactional fraud. A composite benchmark called ERP-RiskBench is assembled from public procurement event logs, labeled fraud data, and a new synthetic ERP dataset with rule-injected risk typologies and conditional tabular GAN augmentation. Nested cross-validation with time-aware and group-aware splitting enforces leakage prevention throughout the pipeline. The primary model is a stacking ensemble of gradient boosting methods, tested alongside linear baselines, deep tabular architectures, and an interpretable glassbox alternative. Performance is measured through Matthews Correlation Coefficient, area under the precision-recall curve, and cost-sensitive decision analysis using calibrated probabilities. Across multiple dataset configurations and a structured ablation study, the stacking ensemble achieves the best detection results. Leakage-safe protocols reduce previously inflated accuracy estimates by a notable margin. SHAP-based explanations and feature stability analysis show that procurement control features, especially three-way matching discrepancies, rank as the most informative predictors. The resulting framework provides a reproducible, operationally grounded blueprint for machine learning deployment in ERP audit and governance settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Mar 2026.

Builds on

9 of 40 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  4. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
  5. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
  6. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 322
  7. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 246
  8. 2025Comparative Evaluation of Embedding Representations for Financial News Sentiment Analysiscited by 1
  9. 2025Security Without Detection: Economic Denial as a Primitive for Edge and IoT Defensecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.