mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Experiences Build Characters: The Linguistic Origins and Functional Impact of LLM Personality

arXiv 2603.06088 ↗First posted 6 Mar 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human problem-solving is enriched by a diversity of styles and personality traits, yet the development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has largely prioritized uniform performance benchmarks that favour specific behavioural tendencies such as assertiveness. To investigate how diverse experiences shape machine personality and influence problem-solving, this study employs continued pre-training to expose models to domain-specific texts in an unsupervised manner, simulating the accumulation of experience. By adapting the Big Five framework via the Machine Personality Inventory (MPI), we quantify the personality traits of these model variants and analyse their relationship to linguistic style and reasoning behaviour. The findings reveal that model competence is bimodal, peaking at "Expressive Generalists" and "Suppressed Specialists," while identifying a "Suppression Advantage" where reduced social traits enhance complex reasoning performance. This study further establishes a causal link between training data linguistics, such as imperative frequency, and lexical diversity, providing a roadmap for "Personality Engineering".

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  4. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  5. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  6. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  7. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  8. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
  9. 2022Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3cited by 398
  10. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Taskscited by 222
  11. 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalizationcited by 208
  12. 2023Continual Pre-training of Language Modelscited by 198
6 more
  1. 2024Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulationscited by 169
  2. 2022Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 123
  3. 2025Can LLM Agents Maintain a Persona in Discourse?cited by 15
  4. 2025Investigating the Impact of LLM Personality on Cognitive Bias Manifestation in Automated Decision-Making Taskscited by 3
  5. 2025Mitigating the Threshold Priming Effect in Large Language Model-Based Relevance Judgments via Personality Infusingcited by 2
  6. 2026Bounded Minds, Generative Machines: Envisioning Conversational AI that Works with Human Heuristics and Reduces Bias Riskcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Power of Personality: A Human Simulation Perspective to Investigate Large Language Model Agents
  2. 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits
  3. 2024Open Models, Closed Minds? On Agents Capabilities in Mimicking Human Personalities through Open Large Language Models
  4. 2025Beyond BFI: The CSI for Enhanced Reliability and Validity in Evaluating LLM Personality Traits
  5. 2026Structured Personality Control and Adaptation for LLM Agents
  6. 2025Vibe Check: Understanding the Effects of LLM-Based Conversational Agents' Personality and Alignment on User Perceptions in Goal-Oriented Tasks
  7. 2025From Five Dimensions to Many: Large Language Models as Precise and Interpretable Psychological Profilers
  8. 2026PTCBENCH: Benchmarking Contextual Stability of Personality Traits in LLM Systems