Improved high-dimensional estimation with Langevin dynamics and stochastic weight averaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Significant recent work has studied the ability of gradient descent to recover a hidden planted direction θ^star ∈ Sd-1 in different high-dimensional settings, including tensor PCA and single-index models. The key quantity that governs the ability of gradient descent to traverse these landscapes is the information exponent k^star (Ben Arous et al., (2021)), which corresponds to the order of the saddle at initialization in the population landscape. Ben Arous et al., (2021) showed that n gtrsim dmax(1, k^star-1) samples were necessary and sufficient for online SGD to recover θ^star, and Ben Arous et al., (2020) proved a similar lower bound for Langevin dynamics. More recently, Damian et al., (2023) showed it was possible to circumvent these lower bounds by running gradient descent on a smoothed landscape, and that this algorithm succeeds with n gtrsim dmax(1, k^star/2) samples, which is optimal in the worst case. This raises the question of whether it is possible to achieve the same rate without explicit smoothing. In this paper, we show that Langevin dynamics can succeed with n gtrsim d k^star/2 samples if one considers the average iterate, rather than the last iterate. The key idea is that the combination of noise-injection and iterate averaging is able to emulate the effect of landscape smoothing. We apply this result to both the tensor PCA and single-index model settings. Finally, we conjecture that minibatch SGD can also achieve the same rate without adding any additional noise.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2026.
Builds on
18 of 31 references.
References · 18
- 2020Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inferencecited by 119
- 2021Generalization error of random features and kernel methods: hypercontractivity and kernel matrix concentrationcited by 110
- 2014A statistical model for tensor PCAcited by 72
- 2018Gradient Descent with Random Initialization: Fast Global Convergence for Nonconvex Phase Retrievalcited by 71
- 2023How Two-Layer Neural Networks Learn, One (Giant) Step at a Timecited by 67
- 2024The Benefits of Reusing Batches for Gradient Descent in Two-Layer Networks: Breaking the Curse of Information and Leap Exponentscited by 50
- 2024Neural network learns low-dimensional polynomials with SGD near the information-theoretic limitcited by 45
- 2017Fundamental Limits of Weak Recovery with Applications to Phase Retrievalcited by 39
- 2020Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitionscited by 39
- 2015Fast spectral algorithms from sum-of-squares proofs: tensor decomposition and planted sparse vectorscited by 38
- 2015Tensor principal component analysis via sum-of-squares proofscited by 35
- 2024Repetita Iuvant: Data Repetition Allows SGD to Learn High-Dimensional Multi-Index Functionscited by 35
6 more
- 2024Fundamental computational limits of weak learnability in high-dimensional multi-index modelscited by 17
- 2019How to iron out rough landscapes and get optimal performances: Averaged Gradient Descent and its application to tensor PCAcited by 14
- 2016Homotopy Analysis for Tensor PCAcited by 12
- 2025Learning single-index models via harmonic decompositioncited by 7
- 2025The Generative Leap: Sharp Sample Complexity for Efficiently Learning Gaussian Multi-Index Modelscited by 6
- 2024Learning Orthogonal Multi-Index Models: A Fine-Grained Information Exponent Analysiscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.